Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Supplement status
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BigUnionGuy" data-source="post: 3889598" data-attributes="member: 4992"><p>The IBT broadly interpreted the 2/3 rule.</p><p></p><p>(and notice how quiet TDU is)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Thats why, the supplements that had more than a 50% turnout were sent back</p><p></p><p>for further negotiations.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Absolutely.</p><p></p><p></p><p><em>"Any question arising from the application or interpretation of this Section shall be</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>decided by the General President, whose decision shall be final."</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>"Section 6. The General Executive Board is empowered to amend, delete, or add to this </em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Article if at any time it believes such action will be in the interests of the International </em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Union or its subordinate bodies."</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p>While I keep harping on this, if the members had really "shown their voice"</p><p></p><p>by <u>voting</u>.... we wouldn't have this confusion, Or this discussion.</p><p></p><p></p><p>With the previous announcement from Sean O and Fred Z, prior to conclusion</p><p></p><p>of negotiations.... don't you think it's plausible, the IBT General Executive Board</p><p></p><p>and the General President were heeding the advice of the IBT legal team ?</p><p></p><p></p><p>My comments aren't directed at [USER=8481]@Mugarolla[/USER] or [USER=14176]@Bubblehead[/USER].</p><p></p><p>Just a personal opinion, directed towards the membership in general.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>-Bug-</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BigUnionGuy, post: 3889598, member: 4992"] The IBT broadly interpreted the 2/3 rule. (and notice how quiet TDU is) Thats why, the supplements that had more than a 50% turnout were sent back for further negotiations. Absolutely. [I]"Any question arising from the application or interpretation of this Section shall be decided by the General President, whose decision shall be final." "Section 6. The General Executive Board is empowered to amend, delete, or add to this Article if at any time it believes such action will be in the interests of the International Union or its subordinate bodies." [/I] While I keep harping on this, if the members had really "shown their voice" by [U]voting[/U].... we wouldn't have this confusion, Or this discussion. With the previous announcement from Sean O and Fred Z, prior to conclusion of negotiations.... don't you think it's plausible, the IBT General Executive Board and the General President were heeding the advice of the IBT legal team ? My comments aren't directed at [USER=8481]@Mugarolla[/USER] or [USER=14176]@Bubblehead[/USER]. Just a personal opinion, directed towards the membership in general. -Bug- [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Supplement status
Top