Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Supplement status
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="browned out" data-source="post: 3921485" data-attributes="member: 8105"><p>You are correct; it is beyond a shadow of a doubt that the "fix" was(is) in.</p><p></p><p>The majority that voted: over 50,000 UPS Teamsters will have this concessionary cba forced upon them.</p><p></p><p>What is different from 2013; is that a majority of UPS teamsters voted the CBA down.</p><p></p><p>and...Unlike the local 89 proposal in 2013; there is nothing UPS can take from 243. Nothing.</p><p></p><p>243 has not achieved any gains from the original offer. 243 put forth a supplement with language that ambiguous and IS open to interpretation. That does not fulfill the union's responsibility.</p><p></p><p>Other supplements have actually accomplished some gains without any give backs.</p><p></p><p>We do not believe exercising the rights guaranteed by the NLRB violates any UPS or Teamster rules. Aggressive or Passive Aggressive has no place in this venue. Spirited conversation is encouraged and welcomed.</p><p></p><p>It is inevitable that this CBA will be forced thru. What is at issue is the negligence of those entrusted to represent the membership.</p><p></p><p>We do believe that any behavior that violates the Teamster constitution, NLRB rights, state or federal rights or UPS policy needs to be corrected and that all parties need to be truthful and forthright.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="browned out, post: 3921485, member: 8105"] You are correct; it is beyond a shadow of a doubt that the "fix" was(is) in. The majority that voted: over 50,000 UPS Teamsters will have this concessionary cba forced upon them. What is different from 2013; is that a majority of UPS teamsters voted the CBA down. and...Unlike the local 89 proposal in 2013; there is nothing UPS can take from 243. Nothing. 243 has not achieved any gains from the original offer. 243 put forth a supplement with language that ambiguous and IS open to interpretation. That does not fulfill the union's responsibility. Other supplements have actually accomplished some gains without any give backs. We do not believe exercising the rights guaranteed by the NLRB violates any UPS or Teamster rules. Aggressive or Passive Aggressive has no place in this venue. Spirited conversation is encouraged and welcomed. It is inevitable that this CBA will be forced thru. What is at issue is the negligence of those entrusted to represent the membership. We do believe that any behavior that violates the Teamster constitution, NLRB rights, state or federal rights or UPS policy needs to be corrected and that all parties need to be truthful and forthright. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Supplement status
Top