Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
SUREPOST ALLEGED IMPROVEMENTS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frankie&#039;s Friend" data-source="post: 3662971"><p>It appears that the Surepost language has given the company an unlimited right to turn off Redirect at peak or if they choose to "roll" a load. They have done this all along. Now it's a free for all.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]205588[/ATTACH] </p><p></p><p>Now, the proposed language allows the company to tell us that they cant handle additional volume or that it will not be economically feasible so it will be sent to our competition, and all the while "proximity" stops are not defined or redirected back to dues paying members...as usual. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]205589[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>And finally, obscure language allowing us to deliver to the UPS STORES for those non-union folks to disperse our volume? What does this change actually mean?</p><p>This is so vague. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]205591[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Even without Section 4(1) the rest of the proposed changes are concessions.</p><p> </p><p>Worried about rolling volume at peak? Hire more drivers.</p><p>Is there more volume coming that we dont know about during the non peak months?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frankie's Friend, post: 3662971"] It appears that the Surepost language has given the company an unlimited right to turn off Redirect at peak or if they choose to "roll" a load. They have done this all along. Now it's a free for all. [ATTACH=full]205588[/ATTACH] Now, the proposed language allows the company to tell us that they cant handle additional volume or that it will not be economically feasible so it will be sent to our competition, and all the while "proximity" stops are not defined or redirected back to dues paying members...as usual. [ATTACH=full]205589[/ATTACH] And finally, obscure language allowing us to deliver to the UPS STORES for those non-union folks to disperse our volume? What does this change actually mean? This is so vague. [ATTACH=full]205591[/ATTACH] Even without Section 4(1) the rest of the proposed changes are concessions. Worried about rolling volume at peak? Hire more drivers. Is there more volume coming that we dont know about during the non peak months? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
SUREPOST ALLEGED IMPROVEMENTS
Top