Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 1193738" data-attributes="member: 2189">Yeah and sometimes those top secret plans get out, are exposed to the light of day which give cause why one should step way back to question the narrative being told.<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20130129213824/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html" target="_blank">source</a>As opposed to the crap and idiots who run this country?&nbsp; Keep going TOS as before long you&#039;ll come to agree with the Bush rational for invading Iraq.&nbsp; You&#039;re basically there now.&nbsp; Another reason this all has a bad smell too it.There&#039;s reason to believe Obama is doing the same thing, all for the same agenda and serving the same benefactors too.Your reply addressed none of the points made in the piece unless the ad hominems count.&nbsp; Telling me Kerry has evidence I can&#039;t see is not evidence, it&#039;s argumentum ad verecundiam and then I&#039;m to accept an authority that is a known liar.&nbsp; How is hard evidence of a chemical attack that top secret?&nbsp; Why is everything now always Top Secret?&nbsp; If I&#039;m told I have nothing to fear if I have nothing to hide then why does the same rule not apply to the State itself?I&#039;ve said Obama is no different from Bush and this IMO proves it when Obama has you in effect defending the same rational used to invade Iraq.&nbsp; Before this is over, I&#039;d not be surprised you will find cause with your infamous C-9.&nbsp; Give it a week or so of republican spin praising the President&#039;s Syrian plan and even Moreluck will post something positive about Obama!<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very&nbsp; &nbsp; :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 1193738, member: 2189"] Yeah and sometimes those top secret plans get out, are exposed to the light of day which give cause why one should step way back to question the narrative being told. [URL='http://web.archive.org/web/20130129213824/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html'][COLOR=#ff0000]source[/COLOR][/URL] As opposed to the crap and idiots who run this country? Keep going TOS as before long you'll come to agree with the Bush rational for invading Iraq. You're basically there now. Another reason this all has a bad smell too it. There's reason to believe Obama is doing the same thing, all for the same agenda and serving the same benefactors too. Your reply addressed none of the points made in the piece unless the ad hominems count. Telling me Kerry has evidence I can't see is not evidence, it's argumentum ad verecundiam and then I'm to accept an authority that is a known liar. How is hard evidence of a chemical attack that top secret? Why is everything now always Top Secret? If I'm told I have nothing to fear if I have nothing to hide then why does the same rule not apply to the State itself? I've said Obama is no different from Bush and this IMO proves it when Obama has you in effect defending the same rational used to invade Iraq. Before this is over, I'd not be surprised you will find cause with your infamous C-9. Give it a week or so of republican spin praising the President's Syrian plan and even Moreluck will post something positive about Obama! :happy-very: [/QUOTE]

Verification