Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Tattoo Policy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trplnkl" data-source="post: 361036" data-attributes="member: 13254"><p>I'm thinking that Coupe may be right as far as where the tattoo policy comes from. I sure the application of that comes from that level.</p><p> This is from the UPS POLICY BOOK concerning appearance ,this is the only written mention of personal appearance I can find anywhere:</p><p> <span style="color: Sienna">We Expect Our People to Be Neat in Appearance.</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">A neat appearance greatly impacts the way our customers view</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">us and how our employees interact on the job. Our drivers and</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">flight crews and certain other employees wear standard uniforms</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">as a distinct reflection of our company and our service.</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">Just as we require our people who come in contact with the public</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">to maintain a neat appearance, we expect our office people to be</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">well groomed. We ask them to select clothes and accessories that</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">are appropriate to our business environment.</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">Managers and supervisors take note of the appearance of their</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">people daily and set the example through their own proper</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">grooming and attire.</span></p><p> <span style="color: Sienna"></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="color: Black">So it seems to me the question is who gets to decide what is neat and what is not.</span></span></p><p> <span style="color: Sienna"><span style="color: Black">I found the following to be quite interesting also.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="color: Black"></span></span><span style="color: Sienna"><u>We Reimburse Our People for Appropriate Expenditures</u></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><u>Incurred on Behalf of the Company. No one should gain or</u></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><u>lose because of money spent for company purposes. We require</u></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><u>our people to submit an itemized accounting of these expenditures</u>.</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">Sound judgment is necessary in the management of such</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">expenses. Questions concerning these expenses should</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">be resolved in advance with one's manager.</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">Approval of the expenses of those who report to us requires</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">equally careful consideration, as well as attention to guiding</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">them in future expenditures. We periodically review and adjust</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna">our reimbursement practices.</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"></span></p><p> <span style="color: Sienna"><span style="color: Black">Seems to me that if an existing driver was forced to have a previous</span></span><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="color: Black">ly</span></span><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="color: Black"> existing Tat removed because it could not reasonable be covered ,the company should pay for the removal.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="color: Black"></span></span></p><p> <span style="color: Sienna"><span style="color: Black">Of course we all know that the policy book is used by management to suit their purposes and ignore it when it doesn't. So there ya go.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="color: Black"></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trplnkl, post: 361036, member: 13254"] I'm thinking that Coupe may be right as far as where the tattoo policy comes from. I sure the application of that comes from that level. This is from the UPS POLICY BOOK concerning appearance ,this is the only written mention of personal appearance I can find anywhere: [COLOR=Sienna]We Expect Our People to Be Neat in Appearance. A neat appearance greatly impacts the way our customers view us and how our employees interact on the job. Our drivers and flight crews and certain other employees wear standard uniforms as a distinct reflection of our company and our service. Just as we require our people who come in contact with the public to maintain a neat appearance, we expect our office people to be well groomed. We ask them to select clothes and accessories that are appropriate to our business environment. Managers and supervisors take note of the appearance of their people daily and set the example through their own proper grooming and attire. [COLOR=Black]So it seems to me the question is who gets to decide what is neat and what is not. I found the following to be quite interesting also. [/COLOR][/COLOR][COLOR=Sienna][U]We Reimburse Our People for Appropriate Expenditures Incurred on Behalf of the Company. No one should gain or lose because of money spent for company purposes. We require our people to submit an itemized accounting of these expenditures[/U]. Sound judgment is necessary in the management of such expenses. Questions concerning these expenses should be resolved in advance with one's manager. Approval of the expenses of those who report to us requires equally careful consideration, as well as attention to guiding them in future expenditures. We periodically review and adjust our reimbursement practices. [COLOR=Black]Seems to me that if an existing driver was forced to have a previous[/COLOR][/COLOR][COLOR=Sienna][COLOR=Black]ly[/COLOR][/COLOR][COLOR=Sienna][COLOR=Black] existing Tat removed because it could not reasonable be covered ,the company should pay for the removal. Of course we all know that the policy book is used by management to suit their purposes and ignore it when it doesn't. So there ya go. [/COLOR][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Tattoo Policy
Top