Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Tattoos
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="UnconTROLLed" data-source="post: 525646" data-attributes="member: 18708"><p>Not sure I agree here. Interesting debate, it could be.</p><p></p><p>Let's say a company were hiring auto salesman. Ford for example. One guy comes in with tattoos all over his neck, arms, hands - interviewing to be a SALESMAN. and they are visible. Is it discrimination for Ford not to hire this person due to their tattoos being unprofessional looking and placed in areas that are clearly visible? </p><p></p><p>Would it be discrimination for UPS not to allow a part-time employee who has visible tats on their hands, arms, neck to qualify for 30 days driving because they look unprofessional?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="UnconTROLLed, post: 525646, member: 18708"] Not sure I agree here. Interesting debate, it could be. Let's say a company were hiring auto salesman. Ford for example. One guy comes in with tattoos all over his neck, arms, hands - interviewing to be a SALESMAN. and they are visible. Is it discrimination for Ford not to hire this person due to their tattoos being unprofessional looking and placed in areas that are clearly visible? Would it be discrimination for UPS not to allow a part-time employee who has visible tats on their hands, arms, neck to qualify for 30 days driving because they look unprofessional? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Tattoos
Top