Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Tattoos
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 525938" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>We have a driver who was hired with a visible tat on his forearm and it was overlooked for about 15 years before management came to him one day and told him he had to start wearing a long sleeved shirt. He filed a grievance and won, so his tat is "grandfathered" in although he cannot get any more that are visible. New hires are now informed, in writing, of the no-visible-tat rule so there are no misunderstandings. I dont have a problem with a no visible tat rule, but it should not be retroactive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 525938, member: 14668"] We have a driver who was hired with a visible tat on his forearm and it was overlooked for about 15 years before management came to him one day and told him he had to start wearing a long sleeved shirt. He filed a grievance and won, so his tat is "grandfathered" in although he cannot get any more that are visible. New hires are now informed, in writing, of the no-visible-tat rule so there are no misunderstandings. I dont have a problem with a no visible tat rule, but it should not be retroactive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Tattoos
Top