Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
TeamCare upgraded
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rpoz11" data-source="post: 1195208" data-attributes="member: 1622"><p>King of Chester</p><p>and</p><p>OldGray</p><p></p><p>Good points!</p><p>With some enlightened communication between some fellow drivers, and others, </p><p>it was presented to me this very similar scenario. </p><p>Costs!</p><p>With accepting anything currently presented, what contract langauge do we have that is currently present in this next ballot proposal to vote on, that locks in cost increases in precisely the same concerns as you are pointing out. </p><p></p><p>MAINTENANCE AND STANDARDS language was the key pointe given to me protecting us from this very scenario!</p><p></p><p>With regards to the ever present ACA forthcoming, as I have pointed out to several members, this is a HC Plan that has never been LAW in this country. </p><p></p><p>In regards to our Teamster members, lets look ahead at this and be concerned that we all need contract language that protects the unknown. </p><p>Just the same as you have suggested above here. </p><p>Your $1500.00 per person would seem to be a fair number of imbalances. </p><p></p><p>I have repeatedly pointed out to some of my Executive Board Officers in my Local, what coverages are we going to be able to replace IF & when it surpasses what we are being asked to accept. </p><p></p><p>Be very concerned, as TOS has pointed out, that coverages could possibly be reworked later after this proposal is eventually at some pointed agreed to. </p><p></p><p>There are no guarantees for anyone in the west with this current language that nothing will change costing us more out of pocket.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rpoz11, post: 1195208, member: 1622"] King of Chester and OldGray Good points! With some enlightened communication between some fellow drivers, and others, it was presented to me this very similar scenario. Costs! With accepting anything currently presented, what contract langauge do we have that is currently present in this next ballot proposal to vote on, that locks in cost increases in precisely the same concerns as you are pointing out. MAINTENANCE AND STANDARDS language was the key pointe given to me protecting us from this very scenario! With regards to the ever present ACA forthcoming, as I have pointed out to several members, this is a HC Plan that has never been LAW in this country. In regards to our Teamster members, lets look ahead at this and be concerned that we all need contract language that protects the unknown. Just the same as you have suggested above here. Your $1500.00 per person would seem to be a fair number of imbalances. I have repeatedly pointed out to some of my Executive Board Officers in my Local, what coverages are we going to be able to replace IF & when it surpasses what we are being asked to accept. Be very concerned, as TOS has pointed out, that coverages could possibly be reworked later after this proposal is eventually at some pointed agreed to. There are no guarantees for anyone in the west with this current language that nothing will change costing us more out of pocket. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
TeamCare upgraded
Top