Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Teamsters to STRIKE UPS coming soon.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frankie&#039;s Friend" data-source="post: 3652494"><p>We know the cushion the company had in 97. No real competition to worry about taking our volume. </p><p>But now, it's even more of a gamble and truly a losing proposition.</p><p></p><p>Both sides lose. Everyone goes down together.</p><p></p><p>But...</p><p></p><p>Do you remember what Kelly said when Carey left the GP position?</p><p></p><p>It was reported from a company source that he was glad to have Jr as GP because he was more of a businessman than Carey. (Paraphrased)</p><p></p><p>So which is better:</p><p>*Strength (to keep the company at bay).</p><p>Or...</p><p>*Compromise to help the company post even larger profits (future marketplace share).</p><p>?</p><p>Since few of us have any low down on the TA trade offs it is hard to judge the big picture of what's going on in the negotiations but I believe that a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.</p><p></p><p>Looks like L89 did well. How does that compare to the CR and the NMA? There may be an enlightening example.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frankie's Friend, post: 3652494"] We know the cushion the company had in 97. No real competition to worry about taking our volume. But now, it's even more of a gamble and truly a losing proposition. Both sides lose. Everyone goes down together. But... Do you remember what Kelly said when Carey left the GP position? It was reported from a company source that he was glad to have Jr as GP because he was more of a businessman than Carey. (Paraphrased) So which is better: *Strength (to keep the company at bay). Or... *Compromise to help the company post even larger profits (future marketplace share). ? Since few of us have any low down on the TA trade offs it is hard to judge the big picture of what's going on in the negotiations but I believe that a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Looks like L89 did well. How does that compare to the CR and the NMA? There may be an enlightening example. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Teamsters to STRIKE UPS coming soon.
Top