Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
telematicks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 807526" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>I quote Article 2, Section 2 of the Master Agreement;</p><p> </p><p>".....nothing in this Master Agreement shall deprive any employee of any <strong>superior benefit contained in their Supplement, Rider or Addendum</strong>."</p><p> </p><p>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p> </p><p>Telematics data by itself, with no other other evidence, is <strong>not proof</strong> of dishonesty...whether it be the first or second or fifth offense. At least not in the Western Region.</p><p> </p><p>I point this out because there are a lot of people who are afraid that they will get hauled into the office and fired due to an inaccurate Telematics report. And it simply is not the case, at least in the West.</p><p> </p><p>The cheaters and liars are still getting fired...as they should be...but the terminations are based upon direct observations or the conflicting/dishonest statements they make when questioned about the Telematics data, <strong>not</strong> the data itself.</p><p> </p><p>It may sound like I am splitting hairs, but the distinction is an important one. It protects us from being fired based solely on ambiguous or faulty Telematics data, <em>regardless</em> of whether or not it is for a first offense.</p><p> </p><p>The bottom line is this; do your job the correct way and you have nothing to fear from Telematics.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 807526, member: 14668"] I quote Article 2, Section 2 of the Master Agreement; ".....nothing in this Master Agreement shall deprive any employee of any [B]superior benefit contained in their Supplement, Rider or Addendum[/B]." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Telematics data by itself, with no other other evidence, is [B]not proof[/B] of dishonesty...whether it be the first or second or fifth offense. At least not in the Western Region. I point this out because there are a lot of people who are afraid that they will get hauled into the office and fired due to an inaccurate Telematics report. And it simply is not the case, at least in the West. The cheaters and liars are still getting fired...as they should be...but the terminations are based upon direct observations or the conflicting/dishonest statements they make when questioned about the Telematics data, [B]not[/B] the data itself. It may sound like I am splitting hairs, but the distinction is an important one. It protects us from being fired based solely on ambiguous or faulty Telematics data, [I]regardless[/I] of whether or not it is for a first offense. The bottom line is this; do your job the correct way and you have nothing to fear from Telematics. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
telematicks
Top