Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Telematics and peak
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 664338" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>My only point is that, if you are going to evaluate the <em>true</em> costs and benefits of the program, you have to factor in <em>all</em> of the data.</p><p> </p><p>This data would therefore include the <em>huge</em> amounts of money that are currently being wasted by obsessing over "stupid" discrepancies and other trivia. It is a routine occurence here for a driver and his shop steward to spend a combined total of 45 minutes to an hour discussing a 1 minute discrepancy.</p><p> </p><p>It would be naive of me to assume that mine is the<em> only</em> location where this behavior is occuring. UPS being what it is, I would tend to think that this behavior is more of the rule, rather than the exception.</p><p> </p><p>Currently, the huge amount of time spent nitpicking over Telematics minutae is being coded out in the DIAD under "approved meetings". I am curious....is all of the time spent discussing the data being factored in to the cost/benefit analysis of Telematics as a whole? Or, as we so often see in the other new programs that UPS implements, is that cost simply being "shifted" to other areas of the operation in order to maintain the illusion of success?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 664338, member: 14668"] My only point is that, if you are going to evaluate the [I]true[/I] costs and benefits of the program, you have to factor in [I]all[/I] of the data. This data would therefore include the [I]huge[/I] amounts of money that are currently being wasted by obsessing over "stupid" discrepancies and other trivia. It is a routine occurence here for a driver and his shop steward to spend a combined total of 45 minutes to an hour discussing a 1 minute discrepancy. It would be naive of me to assume that mine is the[I] only[/I] location where this behavior is occuring. UPS being what it is, I would tend to think that this behavior is more of the rule, rather than the exception. Currently, the huge amount of time spent nitpicking over Telematics minutae is being coded out in the DIAD under "approved meetings". I am curious....is all of the time spent discussing the data being factored in to the cost/benefit analysis of Telematics as a whole? Or, as we so often see in the other new programs that UPS implements, is that cost simply being "shifted" to other areas of the operation in order to maintain the illusion of success? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Telematics and peak
Top