Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Telematics and peak
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RoyalFlush" data-source="post: 665026" data-attributes="member: 27311"><p><span style="color: #2e2e2e"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Results are different from elements. That's where it gets fuzzy. They take the number of seat belt occurrences and length of backing reduction and assign a safety cost savings figure to it. It reminds of the Ernest car commercial we he says "you’re gonna save $59,000 on a $10,000 car." It's not an actual cost savings. If you back less, you will have less backing accidents, therefore you will save X dollars is only true if you actually reduce backing accident and even then you may have reduced them by other means. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #2e2e2e"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Rear vision monitors already fixed the backing problem???? We have more backing accidents now than when they didn't exist and I'm sure someone, somewhere cost justified them before they were installed. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #2e2e2e"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Show me some productivity numbers and I tell you how they shifted the cost to another category. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #2e2e2e"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">How can telematics itself possibly improve productivity? All it does is tell you where the driver was and at what time. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RoyalFlush, post: 665026, member: 27311"] [COLOR=#2e2e2e][FONT=Verdana]Results are different from elements. That's where it gets fuzzy. They take the number of seat belt occurrences and length of backing reduction and assign a safety cost savings figure to it. It reminds of the Ernest car commercial we he says "you’re gonna save $59,000 on a $10,000 car." It's not an actual cost savings. If you back less, you will have less backing accidents, therefore you will save X dollars is only true if you actually reduce backing accident and even then you may have reduced them by other means. [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#2e2e2e][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#2e2e2e][FONT=Verdana]Rear vision monitors already fixed the backing problem???? We have more backing accidents now than when they didn't exist and I'm sure someone, somewhere cost justified them before they were installed. [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#2e2e2e][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#2e2e2e][FONT=Verdana]Show me some productivity numbers and I tell you how they shifted the cost to another category. [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#2e2e2e][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#2e2e2e][FONT=Verdana]How can telematics itself possibly improve productivity? All it does is tell you where the driver was and at what time. [/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Telematics and peak
Top