Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="stevetheupsguy" data-source="post: 489832" data-attributes="member: 9662">OAO&#039;s are also done by hourly personnel, namely the safety co-chair, when mgmt finds it suitable.&nbsp;Most people only work here because UPS supports them and their families, which does not mean &quot;provide&quot;, to them, as it is actually the service &quot;provider&quot; doing all the work, for the wage they receive, which is actually the provision you speak of. Furthermore it is actually the service &quot;provider&quot; that supports UPS, &quot;providing&quot; a backbone (support) for the company. &nbsp;If this was merely a post stating what it does for you, I don&#039;t think you would have found the need to post as angrily as you did, originally. It sounds to me, though your lecture on how and where the safety money is spent, was quite accurate, as if you are a gung ho person, that is only seeing things from their side of the mountain. Everything looks good from that point. I fear though, that if you were to somehow come to our vantage point, your ideas may be altered. Your tone was way different in this post than in the previous, thanks for relaxing a bit. I understand where you&#039;re coming from, but as you stated, this is all to pass the KETER audit, so that we may be pleasing to almighty OSHA. Another way of putting it is, UPS has been spanked enough by OSHA that they will do whatever it takes, as long as it&#039;s less money than they would have actually paid in fines. jmo as always.&nbsp;PS In future post, could you break it up into, say, 5-6 sentences per paragraph, so it&#039;s easier to read? Thanks<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy2.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy2:" title="Happy2&nbsp; &nbsp; :happy2:" data-shortname=":happy2:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="stevetheupsguy, post: 489832, member: 9662"] OAO's are also done by hourly personnel, namely the safety co-chair, when mgmt finds it suitable. Most people only work here because UPS supports them and their families, which does not mean "provide", to them, as it is actually the service "provider" doing all the work, for the wage they receive, which is actually the provision you speak of. Furthermore it is actually the service "provider" that supports UPS, "providing" a backbone (support) for the company. If this was merely a post stating what it does for you, I don't think you would have found the need to post as angrily as you did, originally. It sounds to me, though your lecture on how and where the safety money is spent, was quite accurate, as if you are a gung ho person, that is only seeing things from their side of the mountain. Everything looks good from that point. I fear though, that if you were to somehow come to our vantage point, your ideas may be altered. Your tone was way different in this post than in the previous, thanks for relaxing a bit. I understand where you're coming from, but as you stated, this is all to pass the KETER audit, so that we may be pleasing to almighty OSHA. Another way of putting it is, UPS has been spanked enough by OSHA that they will do whatever it takes, as long as it's less money than they would have actually paid in fines. jmo as always. PS In future post, could you break it up into, say, 5-6 sentences per paragraph, so it's easier to read? Thanks:happy2: [/QUOTE]

Verification