Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Telematics-who watches the watchers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pretzel_man" data-source="post: 481810" data-attributes="member: 927"><p>I can only assume you have not read what I've posted on this previously. I've answered most of these items before. I'll recap:</p><p> </p><p>First, I never said that this system will not be abused. As with anything, the potential exists. I've said that to date it has not been used as a tool for discipline and dismissal. </p><p> </p><p>I mentioned the one case and you can choose to believe me or not. I have no reason to lie. If I'm incorrect, the union has the evidence to prove me wrong.</p><p> </p><p>I'm certain that somewhere in America, a poor manager will use this tool improperly. I'm also certain that it will find a driver somewhere that is acting dishonestly. This does not make all drivers bad, all managers bad, or the tool improper.</p><p> </p><p>As far as building an interlocking device, I said I don't know why they chose the path they did. Its likely because the system does more than only improve safety. Its also used for Automotive analysis. This was probably the most cost effective way to meet all goals.</p><p> </p><p>I see your examples of where UPS has done wrong in some operations. This doesn't make the concept of triples or air drivers wrong. It just means that improper use must be addressed. </p><p> </p><p>The same is true for this system. It has the potential to improve safety, reduce fuel costs, reduce automotive expense, and reduce breakdowns.</p><p> </p><p>Again, you can choose to believe me or not. </p><p> </p><p>P-Man</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pretzel_man, post: 481810, member: 927"] I can only assume you have not read what I've posted on this previously. I've answered most of these items before. I'll recap: First, I never said that this system will not be abused. As with anything, the potential exists. I've said that to date it has not been used as a tool for discipline and dismissal. I mentioned the one case and you can choose to believe me or not. I have no reason to lie. If I'm incorrect, the union has the evidence to prove me wrong. I'm certain that somewhere in America, a poor manager will use this tool improperly. I'm also certain that it will find a driver somewhere that is acting dishonestly. This does not make all drivers bad, all managers bad, or the tool improper. As far as building an interlocking device, I said I don't know why they chose the path they did. Its likely because the system does more than only improve safety. Its also used for Automotive analysis. This was probably the most cost effective way to meet all goals. I see your examples of where UPS has done wrong in some operations. This doesn't make the concept of triples or air drivers wrong. It just means that improper use must be addressed. The same is true for this system. It has the potential to improve safety, reduce fuel costs, reduce automotive expense, and reduce breakdowns. Again, you can choose to believe me or not. P-Man [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Telematics-who watches the watchers?
Top