Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
tentative contract now online
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KTB" data-source="post: 253030" data-attributes="member: 11975"><p>Right on. <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/thumbup1.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":thumbup1:" title="Thumbup1 :thumbup1:" data-shortname=":thumbup1:" /> The more part time to full time we get the better. You'll get no arguments out of me on that. I was talking about the speculation that this contract allowed UPS to eliminate existing 22.3 jobs. That's not the case. I think it's a piece of garbage, but it's important to attack this proposal on what's actually in it. There's enough bad to go after in the proposed contract (like the lack of new 22.3 jobs) that it's important not to swing at phantoms that aren't there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KTB, post: 253030, member: 11975"] Right on. :thumbup1: The more part time to full time we get the better. You'll get no arguments out of me on that. I was talking about the speculation that this contract allowed UPS to eliminate existing 22.3 jobs. That's not the case. I think it's a piece of garbage, but it's important to attack this proposal on what's actually in it. There's enough bad to go after in the proposed contract (like the lack of new 22.3 jobs) that it's important not to swing at phantoms that aren't there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
tentative contract now online
Top