Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BrownFlush" data-source="post: 4849441" data-attributes="member: 65823">Oh yes..there are so many different kinds of animals in existence that it is unreasonable to believe that all of them were able to be placed on the Ark. Huge numbers of animals are assumed to be required to be in the Ark.If science can identify 210,000 different birds, then you would assume that two of each had to be placed in the Ark.Not so. The Bible states that two of every “kind” (min) of unclean animal and seven of every “kind” (min) of clean animal went into the Ark.The animals were grouped according to their “families” (mispahah). This would not demand two of every species but two of each family (genus) of animals. Plenty of room given the measurements of the Ark.I think it&#039;s funny that you say the Ark couldn&#039;t have been big enough to house all of the animals in the world.You have all of the animals in the world including man evolving from a one-celled amoeba that resulted from some chance collision of molecules that appeared out of nothing.If you can get all of creation from an amoeba in a swamp that appeared from nothing, you shouldn’t have trouble accepting that all of the animal creation necessary for the production for animal life could fit&nbsp; in the Ark.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BrownFlush, post: 4849441, member: 65823"] Oh yes..there are so many different kinds of animals in existence that it is unreasonable to believe that all of them were able to be placed on the Ark. Huge numbers of animals are assumed to be required to be in the Ark. If science can identify 210,000 different birds, then you would assume that two of each had to be placed in the Ark. Not so. The Bible states that two of every “kind” (min) of unclean animal and seven of every “kind” (min) of clean animal went into the Ark. The animals were grouped according to their “families” (mispahah). This would not demand two of every species but two of each family (genus) of animals. Plenty of room given the measurements of the Ark. I think it's funny that you say the Ark couldn't have been big enough to house all of the animals in the world. You have all of the animals in the world including man evolving from a one-celled amoeba that resulted from some chance collision of molecules that appeared out of nothing. If you can get all of creation from an amoeba in a swamp that appeared from nothing, you shouldn’t have trouble accepting that all of the animal creation necessary for the production for animal life could fit in the Ark. [/QUOTE]

Verification