Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BrownFlush" data-source="post: 4850564" data-attributes="member: 65823">What in the world VanMan?I don&#039;t have a narrative.Neanderthals? That&#039;s the offspring of [USER=60631]@El Correcto[/USER] and [USER=55017]@It will be fine[/USER] .Oh yes, the story of life..go into museums all over the country and see the evolutionist&#039;s demonstrate what it was.
In replicas, from his imagined earliest forms of life to his imagined later life forms. Demonstrated life forms changed and changing from one form to another, through lizard to bird to animal and then...to man.&nbsp; So, so, stupid.
But to a person with just a little sense, the evolutionist&#039;s work is nothing but a hoax of anthropology and an adroit use, of plaster of Paris. Two million people pass through the museum of Natural History in New York each year and believe the hog wash.

Oh yes, the link. The link that ties man to the lower animals, through a process of mutation, are the Nebraska Man, the Neanderthal Man, and, at one time, the Piltdown Man.
It&#039;s all a hoax . Check out the story of the Piltdown man. Funny.
Neanderthal man first proposed in 1856 as one of the &quot;missing links&quot; and was abandoned as an ancestral species by anthropologies in the 1960s and 1970s. Why?
The fossil record has found no missing link.
The theories of men can change daily but the Lord &quot;is the same yesterday, today and forever&quot; (Heb. 13:8). Maybe one day, man, in all his wisdom, will find the answer God gave a long time ago about how man began. &quot;In the Beginning, God...&quot;

I think you watch too much of the Discovery channel.
</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BrownFlush, post: 4850564, member: 65823"] What in the world VanMan? I don't have a narrative. Neanderthals? That's the offspring of [USER=60631]@El Correcto[/USER] and [USER=55017]@It will be fine[/USER] . [JUSTIFY]Oh yes, the story of life..go into museums all over the country and see the evolutionist's demonstrate what it was. In replicas, from his imagined earliest forms of life to his imagined later life forms. Demonstrated life forms changed and changing from one form to another, through lizard to bird to animal and then...to man. So, so, stupid. But to a person with just a little sense, the evolutionist's work is nothing but a hoax of anthropology and an adroit use, of plaster of Paris. Two million people pass through the museum of Natural History in New York each year and believe the hog wash. Oh yes, the link. The link that ties man to the lower animals, through a process of mutation, are the Nebraska Man, the Neanderthal Man, and, at one time, the Piltdown Man. It's all a hoax . Check out the story of the Piltdown man. Funny. Neanderthal man first proposed in 1856 as one of the "missing links" and was abandoned as an ancestral species by anthropologies in the 1960s and 1970s. Why? The fossil record has found no missing link. The theories of men can change daily but the Lord "is the same yesterday, today and forever" (Heb. 13:8). Maybe one day, man, in all his wisdom, will find the answer God gave a long time ago about how man began. "In the Beginning, God..." I think you watch too much of the Discovery channel. [/JUSTIFY] [/QUOTE]

Verification