Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
The information campaign
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="quadro" data-source="post: 578634" data-attributes="member: 12850"><p>I didn't give an example because there are literally thousands of examples and each one is different so it doesn't do much good to put just one out there and also because I never claimed that the PPP was a good deal.</p><p> </p><p>All I did was correct some misinformation that you had such as "you can't have both plans" and "the PPP contribution is only 5%".</p><p> </p><p>The problem is that those were such glaring errors that it brings the rest of your "facts" into question. Not that the rest of your facts are wrong, it just becomes harder to accept what someone says when there are some fundemental errors.</p><p> </p><p>You still haven't acknowledged that the 5% is not a fixed percentage so I don't know if you've accounted for that in your example; therefore, I don't really know if your example is correct or not.</p><p> </p><p>Also, regardless of if the PPP is a good or bad deal, what's wrong with discussing the merits of why ERISA necessitated the change? What about UPS' ~$6Billion payment to exit Central States? Doesn't make me feel really good about what a union can negotiate for my pension. I would need a lot more info about all of that to feel like I was informed enough to make a decision.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Apparently not as I never really took a position other than to correct some facts that you had wrong and those can easily be verified.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Show me something that I've stated that's false and I'll correct it.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Good for you (and I mean that with all due respect). It's nice to see someone actually take responsibility for their actions and do something about it. I hope whatever you do works better for you than FedEx.</p><p> </p><p>Sorry that you feel that ad hominem attacks and name calling are necessary but I don't take it personally so no hard feelings. <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy2.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy2:" title="Happy2 :happy2:" data-shortname=":happy2:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="quadro, post: 578634, member: 12850"] I didn't give an example because there are literally thousands of examples and each one is different so it doesn't do much good to put just one out there and also because I never claimed that the PPP was a good deal. All I did was correct some misinformation that you had such as "you can't have both plans" and "the PPP contribution is only 5%". The problem is that those were such glaring errors that it brings the rest of your "facts" into question. Not that the rest of your facts are wrong, it just becomes harder to accept what someone says when there are some fundemental errors. You still haven't acknowledged that the 5% is not a fixed percentage so I don't know if you've accounted for that in your example; therefore, I don't really know if your example is correct or not. Also, regardless of if the PPP is a good or bad deal, what's wrong with discussing the merits of why ERISA necessitated the change? What about UPS' ~$6Billion payment to exit Central States? Doesn't make me feel really good about what a union can negotiate for my pension. I would need a lot more info about all of that to feel like I was informed enough to make a decision. Apparently not as I never really took a position other than to correct some facts that you had wrong and those can easily be verified. Show me something that I've stated that's false and I'll correct it. Good for you (and I mean that with all due respect). It's nice to see someone actually take responsibility for their actions and do something about it. I hope whatever you do works better for you than FedEx. Sorry that you feel that ad hominem attacks and name calling are necessary but I don't take it personally so no hard feelings. :happy2: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
The information campaign
Top