Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
The information campaign
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrFedEx" data-source="post: 578779" data-attributes="member: 12508"><p>Yes, FedEx <em>does call it a pension, as in </em><strong>Portable PENSION Plan...</strong>can your read? Double dipping? If the PPP actually was a pension that might be true, but it's not. Another inaccurate statement.</p><p> </p><p>Your "analysis" that because UPS is bigger, they can pay more is moronic. They pay more because they have union-represented employees who demand a decent retirement plan. If the Teamsters weren't there, UPS management could and probably would be just as greedy as FedEx management. Isn't it amazing that a company "infested" with an evil union is so profitable? Could it be that the top execs at UPS are better managers who make less and don't fly around in a huge fleet of corporate jets? UPS is more productive <em>and </em>profitable, even with the Teamsters involved.</p><p> </p><p>Calling a troll a shill doesn't make it a shill, so I'll just call you out as a troll for Fred, OK? Keep on posting, and I'll keep smashing your arguments flat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrFedEx, post: 578779, member: 12508"] Yes, FedEx [I]does call it a pension, as in [/I][B]Portable PENSION Plan...[/B]can your read? Double dipping? If the PPP actually was a pension that might be true, but it's not. Another inaccurate statement. Your "analysis" that because UPS is bigger, they can pay more is moronic. They pay more because they have union-represented employees who demand a decent retirement plan. If the Teamsters weren't there, UPS management could and probably would be just as greedy as FedEx management. Isn't it amazing that a company "infested" with an evil union is so profitable? Could it be that the top execs at UPS are better managers who make less and don't fly around in a huge fleet of corporate jets? UPS is more productive [I]and [/I]profitable, even with the Teamsters involved. Calling a troll a shill doesn't make it a shill, so I'll just call you out as a troll for Fred, OK? Keep on posting, and I'll keep smashing your arguments flat. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
The information campaign
Top