Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
The " Politics " of Bin Laden.... NOT A CELEBRATION Thread!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 834545" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>Moreluck, </p><p> </p><p>The record is clear The facts are facts. George W. Bush FAILED in his war on terror. He attacked two countries for reasons that BOTH in hindsight proved to be wrong. In Iraq, the premise was weapons of mass destruction. Over and over, Bush told america that weapons of mass destruction existed and an "imminent" threat existed. From yellow cake to "24 hours before Saddam launched an attack" the scare tactic was used to convince this nation to go to war. Bush's own hand picked weapons inspector quits (David Kay) and apologizes to the USA for the claims of weapons of mass destructon when he descovered it was a ruse.</p><p> </p><p>Another transition takes place and we go from weapons of mass destruction to purple ink on fingers. Sure, some non threats were killed, Saddam, his sons, al-zarkawi and 250 thousand civilians, but what was gained? We lost over 5000 military personnel there and 1 trillion dollars. We spent 100 million dollars on war reparations for all the (MY BAD's) and the country is no better off today than it was when we invaded.</p><p> </p><p>In Afghanistan, we went to war there first and the onjective was to capture Usama Bin Laden. Millions of dollars of tax payer money was spent wrecklessly entering this country. Our military would never know that it was on a mission that had zero chance of completing. Usama Bin Laden was not there.</p><p> </p><p>The former prime minister of Pakistan Benazir Bhutto, said in 2004 that she believed that usama bin laden was somewhere in pakistan living in an expensive villa. George Bush IGNORED this statement.</p><p> </p><p>What did she know before her death???? Who killed her? Was she silenced?</p><p> </p><p>There are tons of questions surrounding her death. Was she going to expose usama to the U.S. and usama had her killed? She went on record saying that if she was to be assasinated, either usama or the isi who protects usama would kill her. She ended up dead.</p><p> </p><p>But what about Afghanistan? What was accomplished there? Over 2500 military lives lost and billions of dollars in equiptment lost. Our finest soldiers killed in the mountains of that ch*thole looking for a ghost. </p><p> </p><p>I as an american, am angry that we went to a country on a hoax and lost our finest men and women or brought home those finest in the worst mental conditions that could ever be created. And for what? So we could see purple ink on fingers? Or, so that they could be killed by the very people they are training to take over that country? </p><p> </p><p>The mission there was simple, distract america while contractors and american defense industries made millions of dollars. </p><p> </p><p>Two wars, two failures. Almost 2 trillion dollars spent and unpaid, thousands of serious injuries to our service members. An economy wrecked and a recession created in sept 2007 that has lasted almost 5 years. 9 years of these wars and damaged to our country unseen snce the great depression.</p><p> </p><p>Obama comes in, and in 2 years and for less than a million dollars for one mission, kills the leader of AL Qaeda without a single loss of an american life.</p><p> </p><p>From a political perspective, who is the best leader on the war on terror?</p><p> </p><p>Peace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 834545, member: 17969"] Moreluck, The record is clear The facts are facts. George W. Bush FAILED in his war on terror. He attacked two countries for reasons that BOTH in hindsight proved to be wrong. In Iraq, the premise was weapons of mass destruction. Over and over, Bush told america that weapons of mass destruction existed and an "imminent" threat existed. From yellow cake to "24 hours before Saddam launched an attack" the scare tactic was used to convince this nation to go to war. Bush's own hand picked weapons inspector quits (David Kay) and apologizes to the USA for the claims of weapons of mass destructon when he descovered it was a ruse. Another transition takes place and we go from weapons of mass destruction to purple ink on fingers. Sure, some non threats were killed, Saddam, his sons, al-zarkawi and 250 thousand civilians, but what was gained? We lost over 5000 military personnel there and 1 trillion dollars. We spent 100 million dollars on war reparations for all the (MY BAD's) and the country is no better off today than it was when we invaded. In Afghanistan, we went to war there first and the onjective was to capture Usama Bin Laden. Millions of dollars of tax payer money was spent wrecklessly entering this country. Our military would never know that it was on a mission that had zero chance of completing. Usama Bin Laden was not there. The former prime minister of Pakistan Benazir Bhutto, said in 2004 that she believed that usama bin laden was somewhere in pakistan living in an expensive villa. George Bush IGNORED this statement. What did she know before her death???? Who killed her? Was she silenced? There are tons of questions surrounding her death. Was she going to expose usama to the U.S. and usama had her killed? She went on record saying that if she was to be assasinated, either usama or the isi who protects usama would kill her. She ended up dead. But what about Afghanistan? What was accomplished there? Over 2500 military lives lost and billions of dollars in equiptment lost. Our finest soldiers killed in the mountains of that ch*thole looking for a ghost. I as an american, am angry that we went to a country on a hoax and lost our finest men and women or brought home those finest in the worst mental conditions that could ever be created. And for what? So we could see purple ink on fingers? Or, so that they could be killed by the very people they are training to take over that country? The mission there was simple, distract america while contractors and american defense industries made millions of dollars. Two wars, two failures. Almost 2 trillion dollars spent and unpaid, thousands of serious injuries to our service members. An economy wrecked and a recession created in sept 2007 that has lasted almost 5 years. 9 years of these wars and damaged to our country unseen snce the great depression. Obama comes in, and in 2 years and for less than a million dollars for one mission, kills the leader of AL Qaeda without a single loss of an american life. From a political perspective, who is the best leader on the war on terror? Peace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
The " Politics " of Bin Laden.... NOT A CELEBRATION Thread!
Top