Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 5612476" data-attributes="member: 58386">There was a 4 year window whereby Biden no longer held public office. Four years was more than enough time to prosecute Biden on the basis of whatever grounds for prosecution they could uncover.So you tell me...why didn&#039;t they do it? Is it Biden&#039;s fault that the inept Trump DOJ squandered an opportunity? Or was it&nbsp; a case where the DOJ believed that the evidence wasn&#039;t strong enough to favor a conviction?Quit crabbing at straws in an attempt to feel better about the Trump matter. He brought this entire load of grief on himself. It would appear that what he never expected was that Jack Smith would produce an indictment this large backed with damning evidence an in such fashion that top dog lawyers all over the country are going before public media to marvel at it&#039;s thoroughness and professionalism. And among them Trump AG Bill Barr and Bush White House ethics attorney Richard Painter.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 5612476, member: 58386"] There was a 4 year window whereby Biden no longer held public office. Four years was more than enough time to prosecute Biden on the basis of whatever grounds for prosecution they could uncover. So you tell me...why didn't they do it? Is it Biden's fault that the inept Trump DOJ squandered an opportunity? Or was it a case where the DOJ believed that the evidence wasn't strong enough to favor a conviction? Quit crabbing at straws in an attempt to feel better about the Trump matter. He brought this entire load of grief on himself. It would appear that what he never expected was that Jack Smith would produce an indictment this large backed with damning evidence an in such fashion that top dog lawyers all over the country are going before public media to marvel at it's thoroughness and professionalism. And among them Trump AG Bill Barr and Bush White House ethics attorney Richard Painter. [/QUOTE]

Verification