Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 5613447" data-attributes="member: 58386">Adversarial tensions between both long standing and emerging global powers are the highest since the Cold War and appear to be reaching levels exceeded only by those at the outbreak of World War II. As a nation we simply cannot allow the reckless and boorish behavior of a former president to result in giving to those adversaries anything they could use to their advantage.This is indeed the Information Age where even the most benign looking information can be used to change the course of global events.So grow up Van. There is only so much money to go around and therefore DOJ like all other federal agencies has to pick it&#039;s spots when it comes to when where and how much of it&#039;s resources it can spend on a given case.&nbsp; The reason being is that if it were to spend large amounts of labor and resources on a case but failed to gain a conviction the DOJ is then often subjected to intense public criticism for having done so. In the case of Clinton and Biden if the evidence rose to the level whereby it offered a strong enough possibility of a conviction an indictment would have been filed years ago.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 5613447, member: 58386"] Adversarial tensions between both long standing and emerging global powers are the highest since the Cold War and appear to be reaching levels exceeded only by those at the outbreak of World War II. As a nation we simply cannot allow the reckless and boorish behavior of a former president to result in giving to those adversaries anything they could use to their advantage. This is indeed the Information Age where even the most benign looking information can be used to change the course of global events. So grow up Van. There is only so much money to go around and therefore DOJ like all other federal agencies has to pick it's spots when it comes to when where and how much of it's resources it can spend on a given case. The reason being is that if it were to spend large amounts of labor and resources on a case but failed to gain a conviction the DOJ is then often subjected to intense public criticism for having done so. In the case of Clinton and Biden if the evidence rose to the level whereby it offered a strong enough possibility of a conviction an indictment would have been filed years ago. [/QUOTE]

Verification