Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Total Service Disruption today?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maui" data-source="post: 3311884" data-attributes="member: 45037"><p>So no work is performed.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The only timing requirements are that a first meal break occur in the 5th hour and that a second meal break happen by the 10th hour.</p><p></p><p>The original complaint was that breaks should be required every 5 hours worked, so that there was not a work period of greater than 5 hours without a meal break. This included a claim against early lunching.</p><p></p><p>"In aid of a court-ordered mediation, the parties stipulated to the trial court‟s</p><p>resolving the legal issue central to the early lunching theory: whether state law</p><p>imposes timing requirements on when a meal period must be provided and, if so,</p><p>what it requires."</p><p></p><p>So that specific question was answered in the quoted portion of the opinion. "<strong>does not impose additional timing requirements." </strong>The question addressed lunches<strong> in </strong>the first hour. This reversed the opinion of the trial court that "early lunching" was disallowed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maui, post: 3311884, member: 45037"] So no work is performed. The only timing requirements are that a first meal break occur in the 5th hour and that a second meal break happen by the 10th hour. The original complaint was that breaks should be required every 5 hours worked, so that there was not a work period of greater than 5 hours without a meal break. This included a claim against early lunching. "In aid of a court-ordered mediation, the parties stipulated to the trial court‟s resolving the legal issue central to the early lunching theory: whether state law imposes timing requirements on when a meal period must be provided and, if so, what it requires." So that specific question was answered in the quoted portion of the opinion. "[B]does not impose additional timing requirements." [/B]The question addressed lunches[B] in [/B]the first hour. This reversed the opinion of the trial court that "early lunching" was disallowed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Total Service Disruption today?
Top