Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
TROLLS in the BROWN CAFE!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bbsam" data-source="post: 559707" data-attributes="member: 22662"><p>lol. No, I am not a scholar either. But I do enjoy word play from time to time. It may simply be that in this instance be that the equation is not 2n=1p but rather that 1n+1p>0. It would all depend of upon the value one assigns to n and p. In fact, depending upon the subset in which on is dealing, "cocky" could be construed as a positive and thus increasing the amount by which 1n+1p>0. Of course the inverse is also true that if the negative value of "cocky" so completely overshadows a miniscule value of "reasonably informed" as to make the relationship 1n+1p<0 and by definition negative. On the chance that n and p are assigned the same value then we are faced with the obvious conclusion of a zero sum. So in conclusion, the literary and logical suggestion that two negatives make a positive can only be true in a completely objective setting. Once adjectives like "cocky" and "reasonably informed" enter the fray, we have entered into the realm of the subjective, and thus a more fluid relationship in the assignment of negative or positive.<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/smart.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":smart:" title="Smart :smart:" data-shortname=":smart:" /> Or I could just be full of crap.<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bbsam, post: 559707, member: 22662"] lol. No, I am not a scholar either. But I do enjoy word play from time to time. It may simply be that in this instance be that the equation is not 2n=1p but rather that 1n+1p>0. It would all depend of upon the value one assigns to n and p. In fact, depending upon the subset in which on is dealing, "cocky" could be construed as a positive and thus increasing the amount by which 1n+1p>0. Of course the inverse is also true that if the negative value of "cocky" so completely overshadows a miniscule value of "reasonably informed" as to make the relationship 1n+1p<0 and by definition negative. On the chance that n and p are assigned the same value then we are faced with the obvious conclusion of a zero sum. So in conclusion, the literary and logical suggestion that two negatives make a positive can only be true in a completely objective setting. Once adjectives like "cocky" and "reasonably informed" enter the fray, we have entered into the realm of the subjective, and thus a more fluid relationship in the assignment of negative or positive.:smart: Or I could just be full of crap.:wink2: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
TROLLS in the BROWN CAFE!
Top