Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DriveInDriѵeOut" data-source="post: 2035222" data-attributes="member: 44954"><p>I agree.  But his question remains, why would you oppose government paid higher education, but not apply the same line of thinking to k-12 education, or medicare, or roads, or the police, or the military, or anything else the government provides?  Wouldn't all those things also be cheaper if "the market was built around what  average people could actually afford" as you say?  Why do you take such a hard line stance for no government involvement on some things but not others?</p></blockquote><p></p>