Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BrownArmy" data-source="post: 2104037" data-attributes="member: 18225">Listen to yourself.The &#039;Brown-Shirts&#039; of the...what?You&#039;re mistaken...the only &#039;brown-shirts&#039; are at the Trump rallies.Trump is filling in all the boxes of a fascist campaign.Back to the point, the 1st Amendment works both ways.Yes, yes, it&#039;s poor form how the protesting &#039;disrupters&#039; of the Trump campaign are conducting themselves.&nbsp; Or it&#039;s not.&nbsp; That depends on your ideas about civil disobedience. Whether you agree or not, certain citizens rabidly disagree with Trump and his rhetoric.If a thing is broken, the only way to call &#039;bull&#039; is to call bull and do it in en masse.I have no problems with the citizenry protesting Trump.And yet, wasn&#039;t it Trump who called for &#039;punching people in the face&#039;, etc?You want a strong-man, no?This is what that looks like.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BrownArmy, post: 2104037, member: 18225"] Listen to yourself. The 'Brown-Shirts' of the...what? You're mistaken...the only 'brown-shirts' are at the Trump rallies. Trump is filling in all the boxes of a fascist campaign. Back to the point, the 1st Amendment works both ways. Yes, yes, it's poor form how the protesting 'disrupters' of the Trump campaign are conducting themselves. Or it's not. That depends on your ideas about civil disobedience. Whether you agree or not, certain citizens rabidly disagree with Trump and his rhetoric. If a thing is broken, the only way to call 'bull' is to call bull and do it in en masse. I have no problems with the citizenry protesting Trump. And yet, wasn't it Trump who called for 'punching people in the face', etc? You want a strong-man, no? This is what that looks like. [/QUOTE]

Verification