Trump asks for a boycott of UPS....

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Good thing the JCOS aren't the DOJ, or those mostly peaceful capitol protestors might be in trouble.
I'm not sure how the mostly peaceful among the capitol protestors could ever be in trouble either way. Trump's Joint Chiefs of Staff obviously weren't talking about them in the first place.
 

over9five

Moderator
Staff member
Just because a very small handful of people targeted officials of the government doesn’t mean it was an insurrection you people are ignorant of the history of insurrections.
Agreed. Just a bunch of morons. If it was an insurrection, don't ya think someone would have brought a gun?
LOLING at an unarmed insurrection!
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
That's what I've been telling the Trumpees. I'd probably vote for a solid Republican (for the first time ever) over Kamala but not over Trump 2.0.
So which solid republicans exist that can ride the Trump hobby horse to power?
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Agreed. Just a bunch of morons. If it was an insurrection, don't ya think someone would have brought a gun?
LOLING at an unarmed insurrection!

Now, now. No need to call Trump's Joint Chiefs of Staff morons.

So which solid republicans exist that can ride the Trump hobby horse to power?

I'd vote for Nikki Haley. Not that Trump worshipers would get off his knob to support her unless/until he gives them explicit permission to do so.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
Agreed. Just a bunch of morons. If it was an insurrection, don't ya think someone would have brought a gun?
LOLING at an unarmed insurrection!
They know exactly what they mean when they use insurrection it’s a broad term. These people operate in the realm of semantics, not reality.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
Now, now. No need to call Trump's Joint Chiefs of Staff morons.



I'd vote for Nikki Haley. Not that Trump worshipers would get off his knob to support her unless/until he gives them explicit permission to do so.
Maybe Nikki. I don’t think she could bring herself to beg and grovel enough for Trump’s blessing. She might be a bit too classy.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
Agreed. Just a bunch of morons. If it was an insurrection, don't ya think someone would have brought a gun?
LOLING at an unarmed insurrection!
Why would they need guns? They had Trump. They had the most powerful man in the world on their side. They didn’t know he’d abandon them when things got tough but that’s their own fault for not paying attention to history.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Why would they need guns? They had Trump. They had the most powerful man in the world on their side. They didn’t know he’d abandon them when things got tough but that’s their own fault for not paying attention to history.
Yah because with Trump leading them they were going to take over the entire country without firing a shot LOL!
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
They know exactly what they mean when they use insurrection it’s a broad term. These people operate in the realm of semantics, not reality.
That is an amazing concept. I wonder how lawyers would view it. Would they say something like, “Yes your honor. Technically Joe was involved in the insurrection and he should probably plead guilty but we are pleading not guilty because...well, because reality suggests that the law is based on semantics and that’s inconvenient for our defense.”
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Maybe Nikki. I don’t think she could bring herself to beg and grovel enough for Trump’s blessing. She might be a bit too classy.
Never know with South Carolina Republicans. She could could end up having the same chronic problem with speaking her mind on Trump one minute and then suddenly backpedaling the next that Lindsey Graham does. Either way, she would of course need Trump's official blessing to gain meaningful support from the Republican base.
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
That is an amazing concept. I wonder how lawyers would view it. Would they say something like, “Yes your honor. Technically Joe was involved in the insurrection and he should probably plead guilty but we are pleading not guilty because...well, because reality suggests that the law is based on semantics and that’s inconvenient for our defense.”
There were tens of thousands of people at the Trump rally.

How many people have been charged with insurrection?
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
Yah because with Trump leading them they were going to take over the entire country without firing a shot LOL!
Or Trump would lead the QANON faithful and the US forces in defending the nation against a coup brought about by a stolen election.

I know. That sounds friend’n crazy. And a large part of the Republican Party (several members here right now) actually believes it!!
 
Top