Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="teamster 804" data-source="post: 1170034" data-attributes="member: 47758"><p>As far as the medical goes maybe if the previous board didnt run the medical into the ground our current board would not have had to make such drastic moves.Guess what now the medical is in great shape,so your current board negotiated a 300 to 400 dollar pension increase,a faster grievance procedure,an end to retiree medical going up, which i will agree should never have gone up that much to begin with,return clerk 8 hr guarantee,more summer vacation for drivers.These negotiations were brought about from a survey that was handed out to the members.Guess what they addressed them so what is the problem here,you tell me what did your previous slate get you in your supplement the last two contracts.As far as what you quoted as the steward i speak off,i am not speaking of one steward i am speaking of all the stewards that ran on both slates that ran against current slate.Running a No campaign against supplement for there own agenda instead of what is good for the members.I have said it before and i will say it again the election is over the members spoke they do not want to have anything to do with anyone associated with the old slate.Its over, this local needs a good supplement and whether you like this slate or not they are bringing it to the table.If you do not understand or like anything in supplement when it comes back call your local dont listen to people who have no interest in helping you, they want this slate to fail.Guess what this slate fails we all fail,we all get nothing.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="teamster 804, post: 1170034, member: 47758"] As far as the medical goes maybe if the previous board didnt run the medical into the ground our current board would not have had to make such drastic moves.Guess what now the medical is in great shape,so your current board negotiated a 300 to 400 dollar pension increase,a faster grievance procedure,an end to retiree medical going up, which i will agree should never have gone up that much to begin with,return clerk 8 hr guarantee,more summer vacation for drivers.These negotiations were brought about from a survey that was handed out to the members.Guess what they addressed them so what is the problem here,you tell me what did your previous slate get you in your supplement the last two contracts.As far as what you quoted as the steward i speak off,i am not speaking of one steward i am speaking of all the stewards that ran on both slates that ran against current slate.Running a No campaign against supplement for there own agenda instead of what is good for the members.I have said it before and i will say it again the election is over the members spoke they do not want to have anything to do with anyone associated with the old slate.Its over, this local needs a good supplement and whether you like this slate or not they are bringing it to the table.If you do not understand or like anything in supplement when it comes back call your local dont listen to people who have no interest in helping you, they want this slate to fail.Guess what this slate fails we all fail,we all get nothing. [/QUOTE]

Verification