Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="EyesLookingIn" data-source="post: 805441" data-attributes="member: 29664">Now word out of 43RD ST is that members on the Row C slate are thinking of running against our E Board in 2 years with out Angelo , Tony D and John N.&nbsp; Danny M and others are saying that they are only holding back this slate ,&nbsp; saying that its easy for our E board to attack their past and many members will just vote against them no matter who else is on the slate ,&nbsp; they will look for strong stewards from Long Island. Our membership already voted in a whole new board that had no experience before so there is no need to carry them.&nbsp; WOW I have to say without a doubt they would get many more votes with out old board members. Our whole board campaign is to attack them and their past which is very easy. Lets not forget that our E Board Election is months before the contract is up and we know our board is going to have a field day with Angelo , Tony D and John N because they supported old contracts. I think thats a smart move and in 2 years would be a great test against our board.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="EyesLookingIn, post: 805441, member: 29664"] [I]Now word out of 43RD ST is that members on the Row C slate are thinking of running against our E Board in 2 years with out Angelo , Tony D and John N. Danny M and others are saying that they are only holding back this slate , saying that its easy for our E board to attack their past and many members will just vote against them no matter who else is on the slate , they will look for strong stewards from Long Island. Our membership already voted in a whole new board that had no experience before so there is no need to carry them. WOW I have to say without a doubt they would get many more votes with out old board members. Our whole board campaign is to attack them and their past which is very easy. Lets not forget that our E Board Election is months before the contract is up and we know our board is going to have a field day with Angelo , Tony D and John N because they supported old contracts. I think thats a smart move and in 2 years would be a great test against our board.[/I] [/QUOTE]

Verification