Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Union Politics - 804 members coming soon agitator 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AcesUp804" data-source="post: 999364" data-attributes="member: 7626"><p><strong>So this is on Tony D Web-site did he even read the agreement???? Is he really that DUM????</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>2. Employee has been reinstated on a "last chance agreement" basis. Any future voilation of falsification of records shall be grounds immediate termination of employment without recourse to the grievance or arbitration procedure, EXCEPT to the extent that there is a genuine dispute whether employee actually violated such policy.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Who do you think will deside if there is a genuine dispute??? AN ARBITRATOR YOU CLOWN.......</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>PLUS number 4 says</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>4. This agreement shall not be cited as precedent except in a proceeding to enforce its terms.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>That protects our Local..</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>I CAN NOT BELIEVE THAT TONY D WOULD PUT A MEMBERS PRIVATE DOCUMENT ON HIS WEBSITE, Way to go Tony now let UPS relook at it , you idiot ,, but you only care about yourself.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>I know this driver and they were very happy to be given the chance by the company to get their job back. This was offered to the driver by UPS not LOCAL 804. The driver wanted to sign it no matter what because the driver felt they had no choice either sign or wait over a year and take there chance at arbitration PLUS with the WEAK language that our old board OK'd in the contract our members have no rights. </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Here is something else that makes me laugh the drivers shop steward is Alfonso C that is running with members voice.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>When the driver got there job back HE TOLD EVERYONE IN THE CENTER THAT BECAUSE OF HIM THE DRIVER GOT THERE JOB BACK. Now its on their site...</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>I myself do not agree with these types of agreements but when members have to wait 15 months to see an arbitrator (thanks to our old board) no medical plus our local is losing most of them and I heard that even the ones that got there jobs back GOT NO BACK PAY.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>There has be agreements like this for over 20 years most happen before an arbitration but its the same kind of agreement.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>AS LONG AS THIS AGREEMENT IS NON PRECEDENT AND THE MEMBERS HAS SOME AVENUE TO SEE AN ARBITRATOR THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH IT.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Its up to the members.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AcesUp804, post: 999364, member: 7626"] [B]So this is on Tony D Web-site did he even read the agreement???? Is he really that DUM???? 2. Employee has been reinstated on a "last chance agreement" basis. Any future voilation of falsification of records shall be grounds immediate termination of employment without recourse to the grievance or arbitration procedure, EXCEPT to the extent that there is a genuine dispute whether employee actually violated such policy. Who do you think will deside if there is a genuine dispute??? AN ARBITRATOR YOU CLOWN....... PLUS number 4 says 4. This agreement shall not be cited as precedent except in a proceeding to enforce its terms. That protects our Local.. I CAN NOT BELIEVE THAT TONY D WOULD PUT A MEMBERS PRIVATE DOCUMENT ON HIS WEBSITE, Way to go Tony now let UPS relook at it , you idiot ,, but you only care about yourself. I know this driver and they were very happy to be given the chance by the company to get their job back. This was offered to the driver by UPS not LOCAL 804. The driver wanted to sign it no matter what because the driver felt they had no choice either sign or wait over a year and take there chance at arbitration PLUS with the WEAK language that our old board OK'd in the contract our members have no rights. Here is something else that makes me laugh the drivers shop steward is Alfonso C that is running with members voice. When the driver got there job back HE TOLD EVERYONE IN THE CENTER THAT BECAUSE OF HIM THE DRIVER GOT THERE JOB BACK. Now its on their site... I myself do not agree with these types of agreements but when members have to wait 15 months to see an arbitrator (thanks to our old board) no medical plus our local is losing most of them and I heard that even the ones that got there jobs back GOT NO BACK PAY. There has be agreements like this for over 20 years most happen before an arbitration but its the same kind of agreement. AS LONG AS THIS AGREEMENT IS NON PRECEDENT AND THE MEMBERS HAS SOME AVENUE TO SEE AN ARBITRATOR THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH IT. Its up to the members. [/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Union Politics - 804 members coming soon agitator 2
Top
