Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Union work or not?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nimnim" data-source="post: 3623530" data-attributes="member: 28856"><p>If the bag bundles are on the belt there's no egress issue, not supposed to be walking on the belt unless you're breaking a jam moving a diverter or walking the belt out, so the bundles wouldn't be a hindrance to any of those assuming they let them move to the end of the belt.</p><p></p><p>The bundles aren't packages so I can't reasonably go article 3 section 7 there, but we know they're doing this to ensure there are no actual packages mixed in so there should be an hourly present to handle any package mixed in. It would be one thing in a package fell off a belt and they put it back on but moving a package from one belt to another even if the belt isn't running is progressing the package and does qualify for 3.7.</p><p></p><p>Warning though while I see this as a legit sup working grievance, and depending how you spin it an integrity issue as I can't see an egress issue here, you will get the ire of the sups who have to do write ups for any grievance you file. If you have the tough skin for it go for it, but if you're weak this might not be a big enough issue for you.</p><p></p><p>TLDR: Legit Sup working grievance, do you have the fortitude for it though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nimnim, post: 3623530, member: 28856"] If the bag bundles are on the belt there's no egress issue, not supposed to be walking on the belt unless you're breaking a jam moving a diverter or walking the belt out, so the bundles wouldn't be a hindrance to any of those assuming they let them move to the end of the belt. The bundles aren't packages so I can't reasonably go article 3 section 7 there, but we know they're doing this to ensure there are no actual packages mixed in so there should be an hourly present to handle any package mixed in. It would be one thing in a package fell off a belt and they put it back on but moving a package from one belt to another even if the belt isn't running is progressing the package and does qualify for 3.7. Warning though while I see this as a legit sup working grievance, and depending how you spin it an integrity issue as I can't see an egress issue here, you will get the ire of the sups who have to do write ups for any grievance you file. If you have the tough skin for it go for it, but if you're weak this might not be a big enough issue for you. TLDR: Legit Sup working grievance, do you have the fortitude for it though. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Union work or not?
Top