Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
UPS AIR driver replacement by full time drivers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gandydancer" data-source="post: 488044" data-attributes="member: 9310"><p>Exactly. Not necessarily very clearly though. There is NorCal and 22.3 MOE language on laid off ft displacing pt, and it definately refers to a "full time seniority list" but general bump rights as between ft and pt isn't, I think, covered. On the ft list hire date is used as a tie breaker between all those with the same ft seniority, e.g., all the 22.3's with backdated 8/98 ft seniority, but in bidding against a pt I only have 8/98 seniority, not 1/3/89. And there have been battles over management designating some work as pt only, irregardless of seniority (and I'm not talking about the double shift list, which is pt only per the contract... but the work is available to ft after pt under the "all alternatives" language of the Supervisors Working language).</p><p> </p><p>Bottom line -- there is no national ""right answer" to the original question.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gandydancer, post: 488044, member: 9310"] Exactly. Not necessarily very clearly though. There is NorCal and 22.3 MOE language on laid off ft displacing pt, and it definately refers to a "full time seniority list" but general bump rights as between ft and pt isn't, I think, covered. On the ft list hire date is used as a tie breaker between all those with the same ft seniority, e.g., all the 22.3's with backdated 8/98 ft seniority, but in bidding against a pt I only have 8/98 seniority, not 1/3/89. And there have been battles over management designating some work as pt only, irregardless of seniority (and I'm not talking about the double shift list, which is pt only per the contract... but the work is available to ft after pt under the "all alternatives" language of the Supervisors Working language). Bottom line -- there is no national ""right answer" to the original question. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
UPS AIR driver replacement by full time drivers
Top