Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
UPS should replace the entire fleet with non union workers.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jibbs" data-source="post: 1145435"><p>I never said that I would win, just that I would play the game. Sometimes playing in itself is a victory, even if you don't achieve the desired result. I also never said that I wish for anything to play out as described in my previous post in any way, shape, or form. I merely gave a hypothetical based upon another hypothetical, and you're assuming that I've taken a position. The response was conditional, the conditions hypothetical, and the scenario as a whole possible and plausible.</p><p></p><p>Nowhere in the post did I say this was currently happening or currently being conspired upon, however. I'm sorry for the confusion. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The situation is obvious. FTers have a career, PTers a job. From your post alone I can infer that you hold yourself on a pedestal much higher than your loader, and that's your right. It may not be equitable, it may not be moral, and it may be extremely self-centered of a person in your position to do so, but the inference is there and deserves to be even if I think it wrong. I'm just happy that I've read your contributions in the past and feel that the inference described holds absolutely no truth to it whatsoever and is a miscommunication and/or a misunderstanding.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>[EDIT in reply to the last sentence of your post, Johney:</p><p></p><p></p><p>The job in itself isn't very rewarding. It's the benefits that I'm still waiting to be eligible for and the opportunity to do what YOU do, Johney, that keeps me with UPS. $145 a week, not including union dues? If I get pushed to the right point I can clear more than that with a quarter mile car ride and 10 minutes of my time. The pros and cons in that scenario have made themselves crystal clear, however, and I've decided to turn away from the cliff before I take that one step you can never backtrack from.</p><p></p><p>Point being, don't think for one second that job security is what keeps package handlers loading trucks. It's the carrot dangled in front of us (which a lot of FTers insist is a stick in disguise) that keeps us coming in day in, day out (and hell, some of us don't even clock in on consecutive days).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>....I used too many parentheses in that last sentence. Eh.... fuggit.]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jibbs, post: 1145435"] I never said that I would win, just that I would play the game. Sometimes playing in itself is a victory, even if you don't achieve the desired result. I also never said that I wish for anything to play out as described in my previous post in any way, shape, or form. I merely gave a hypothetical based upon another hypothetical, and you're assuming that I've taken a position. The response was conditional, the conditions hypothetical, and the scenario as a whole possible and plausible. Nowhere in the post did I say this was currently happening or currently being conspired upon, however. I'm sorry for the confusion. The situation is obvious. FTers have a career, PTers a job. From your post alone I can infer that you hold yourself on a pedestal much higher than your loader, and that's your right. It may not be equitable, it may not be moral, and it may be extremely self-centered of a person in your position to do so, but the inference is there and deserves to be even if I think it wrong. I'm just happy that I've read your contributions in the past and feel that the inference described holds absolutely no truth to it whatsoever and is a miscommunication and/or a misunderstanding. [EDIT in reply to the last sentence of your post, Johney: The job in itself isn't very rewarding. It's the benefits that I'm still waiting to be eligible for and the opportunity to do what YOU do, Johney, that keeps me with UPS. $145 a week, not including union dues? If I get pushed to the right point I can clear more than that with a quarter mile car ride and 10 minutes of my time. The pros and cons in that scenario have made themselves crystal clear, however, and I've decided to turn away from the cliff before I take that one step you can never backtrack from. Point being, don't think for one second that job security is what keeps package handlers loading trucks. It's the carrot dangled in front of us (which a lot of FTers insist is a stick in disguise) that keeps us coming in day in, day out (and hell, some of us don't even clock in on consecutive days). ....I used too many parentheses in that last sentence. Eh.... fuggit.] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
UPS should replace the entire fleet with non union workers.
Top