Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
UPS showers in locker rooms at feeder locations.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SeniorGeek" data-source="post: 165720" data-attributes="member: 4823"><p>Which law do you think was violated, and when was it enacted? </p><p> </p><p>I recall reading about a case where someone placed a camera for admittedly-voyeuristic purposes, but in a building he owned. He could not be prosecuted, but a new law was hastily written. Many states have laws that affirm a property or business owner's ability to install a camera without warning everyone who might be recorded. Many of those laws have needed modification to exclude areas with a "reasonable expectation of privacy". Despite how ImpactedTSG's District may have handled the project, there was no directive to put cameras in areas where people get naked.</p><p> </p><p>BTW: Is it just me, or does anyone else find it odd that <u>tieguy</u> would think UPS willfully violated criminal law?This "opportunity" is brimming with imperfection: <u>If</u> this activity was illegal, and <u>if</u> this was done on behalf of UPS, the person making the accusation performed the illegal act, and it was not required by Corporate. With nothing but the testimony of someone with an obvious axe to grind, accusing a widely-known and trusted company, I doubt that any prosecutor would want to touch this. (Maybe in an election year, if we could work some college-age girls with a penchant for men out-of-uniform into the story, the prosecutor would find some political reason....)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SeniorGeek, post: 165720, member: 4823"] Which law do you think was violated, and when was it enacted? I recall reading about a case where someone placed a camera for admittedly-voyeuristic purposes, but in a building he owned. He could not be prosecuted, but a new law was hastily written. Many states have laws that affirm a property or business owner's ability to install a camera without warning everyone who might be recorded. Many of those laws have needed modification to exclude areas with a "reasonable expectation of privacy". Despite how ImpactedTSG's District may have handled the project, there was no directive to put cameras in areas where people get naked. BTW: Is it just me, or does anyone else find it odd that [U]tieguy[/U] would think UPS willfully violated criminal law?This "opportunity" is brimming with imperfection: [U]If[/U] this activity was illegal, and [U]if[/U] this was done on behalf of UPS, the person making the accusation performed the illegal act, and it was not required by Corporate. With nothing but the testimony of someone with an obvious axe to grind, accusing a widely-known and trusted company, I doubt that any prosecutor would want to touch this. (Maybe in an election year, if we could work some college-age girls with a penchant for men out-of-uniform into the story, the prosecutor would find some political reason....) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
UPS showers in locker rooms at feeder locations.
Top