Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MAKAVELI" data-source="post: 2931594" data-attributes="member: 43825"><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/bush-era-tax-cuts-didnt-fix-economy-2012-12" target="_blank">The Bush Era Tax Cuts Didn&#039;t Create The Wealth They Were Supposed To</a>The failure of Republicans to deliver on their promise that tax cuts would be mostly self-financing is a large factor in the deterioration in our long-run fiscal outlook, and it is putting considerable pressure on programs such as Social Security. In fact, the Bush tax cuts can be thought of as a loan from the Social Security Trust Fund that was supposed to be paid back with the revenues from higher economic growth, a loan that is presently in default.To see this, recall that the government began intentionally collecting a surplus from the Social Security program beginning in 1983 in order to prefund the retirement needs of baby boomers. The idea was to run a surplus for several decades while the baby-boomers were still working to get ready for the deficit years the system would experience after they retired.The revenue from Social Security over and above what was needed to fund payouts reduced the overall government debt and allowed taxes to be lower than they could have been without these <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/11/no-social-security-trust-fund-isnt-fiction" target="_blank">surplus funds</a>. For example, the surplus that Bush inherited from the Clinton administration was largely due to the Social Security Trust Fund, and Bush argued it would be better to give this surplus to the private sector through tax cuts than to leave it in the hands of the government.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MAKAVELI, post: 2931594, member: 43825"] [URL="http://www.businessinsider.com/bush-era-tax-cuts-didnt-fix-economy-2012-12"]The Bush Era Tax Cuts Didn't Create The Wealth They Were Supposed To[/URL] The failure of Republicans to deliver on their promise that tax cuts would be mostly self-financing is a large factor in the deterioration in our long-run fiscal outlook, and it is putting considerable pressure on programs such as Social Security. In fact, the Bush tax cuts can be thought of as a loan from the Social Security Trust Fund that was supposed to be paid back with the revenues from higher economic growth, a loan that is presently in default. To see this, recall that the government began intentionally collecting a surplus from the Social Security program beginning in 1983 in order to prefund the retirement needs of baby boomers. The idea was to run a surplus for several decades while the baby-boomers were still working to get ready for the deficit years the system would experience after they retired. The revenue from Social Security over and above what was needed to fund payouts reduced the overall government debt and allowed taxes to be lower than they could have been without these [URL='http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/11/no-social-security-trust-fund-isnt-fiction']surplus funds[/URL]. For example, the surplus that Bush inherited from the Clinton administration was largely due to the Social Security Trust Fund, and Bush argued it would be better to give this surplus to the private sector through tax cuts than to leave it in the hands of the government. [/QUOTE]

Verification