Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
We are being sold.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 1534344" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Agreed (see bold text).</p><p></p><p>And also agree to your 3 points as well.</p><p></p><p>As to the "rich and powerful" rich is a collective term that is impossible to generalize. Same is true of the terms "poor" "working class" "LIBERAL" "conservative" or even "trolls". Names are just a form of collectivism and group think and ignores the fact that we are dealing with individuals. </p><p></p><p>I don't see all "rich" people as bad nor do I see anyone rich as meaning they achieved what they have by hard work and moral actions. But more than a few of the so-called rich do game the political system to their own ends such as the Koch Brothers on the so-called right/GOP/libertarian or George Soros or even Warren Buffet on the left/democrat/progressive side. And BTW in the case of the Koch Bros. they've also been contributors to the Democrat Leadership Council as they also are major funders to the Cato Institute which they started so radical libertarian Murray Rothbard could highlight his work among others.</p><p></p><p>And as to Molyneux, some argue he is running a type of cult as a result of work in other areas and they make a good argument for that claim.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 1534344, member: 2189"] Agreed (see bold text). And also agree to your 3 points as well. As to the "rich and powerful" rich is a collective term that is impossible to generalize. Same is true of the terms "poor" "working class" "LIBERAL" "conservative" or even "trolls". Names are just a form of collectivism and group think and ignores the fact that we are dealing with individuals. I don't see all "rich" people as bad nor do I see anyone rich as meaning they achieved what they have by hard work and moral actions. But more than a few of the so-called rich do game the political system to their own ends such as the Koch Brothers on the so-called right/GOP/libertarian or George Soros or even Warren Buffet on the left/democrat/progressive side. And BTW in the case of the Koch Bros. they've also been contributors to the Democrat Leadership Council as they also are major funders to the Cato Institute which they started so radical libertarian Murray Rothbard could highlight his work among others. And as to Molyneux, some argue he is running a type of cult as a result of work in other areas and they make a good argument for that claim. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
We are being sold.
Top