Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Welcome to Stupid Saturday
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Catatonic" data-source="post: 2532514" data-attributes="member: 7966"><p>Your analysis seems to me to be dishonest (according to me). <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/glare.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":glare:" title="Glare :glare:" data-shortname=":glare:" /></p><p>If you read through the entire thread, the current discussion is about whether a driver should work as directed when given <strong><u>written</u></strong> (on DIAD, for instance) instructions that are different than standard procedures.</p><p>The premise is drivers should work as directed if it is not unsafe or illegal. There is some who conjecture that dishonest equals illegal but the two are different sets.</p><p>So with this summary of the thread to this point, please give your opinion on this scenario:</p><p></p><p>A driver is instructed to sheet packages up as EC and come on in.</p><p>The driver asks for verification on the DIAD and receives written verification that he/she is being instructed to do something that that the driver perceives as being dishonest (or a snow cone or a piece of pizza, really doesn't matter what the driver calls it).</p><p>Should the driver work as directed or refuse and sheet per standard procedure.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Catatonic, post: 2532514, member: 7966"] Your analysis seems to me to be dishonest (according to me). :glare: If you read through the entire thread, the current discussion is about whether a driver should work as directed when given [B][U]written[/U][/B] (on DIAD, for instance) instructions that are different than standard procedures. The premise is drivers should work as directed if it is not unsafe or illegal. There is some who conjecture that dishonest equals illegal but the two are different sets. So with this summary of the thread to this point, please give your opinion on this scenario: A driver is instructed to sheet packages up as EC and come on in. The driver asks for verification on the DIAD and receives written verification that he/she is being instructed to do something that that the driver perceives as being dishonest (or a snow cone or a piece of pizza, really doesn't matter what the driver calls it). Should the driver work as directed or refuse and sheet per standard procedure. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Welcome to Stupid Saturday
Top