Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Wesley
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 785269" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>The State asserted Wesley owed a tax, rent if you will and it actually is in the true historical use of the term <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_rent" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">rent</span></a>. Wesley however alleged he owed no such rent and in some elements of tax law he may have had a point and legal standing. The State however has a monopoly of force and took Wesley to another monopoly they hold and that is one of so-called justice and a monopoly also on the rules of justice and what can and can't be used as evidence. And then we are to accept this verdict as not only just but morally true? We are denied in a so-called legal proceding to allow all evidence in which a person acted on and this same evidence could also point to a true good faith position that concluded with an incorrect total of tax liability but it was not arrived at by unlawful intent means. It's the very same thing people do when they make a mistake on a deduction, one taken in good faith and yet the IRS and/or DOJ can block any evidence trail that shows good faith and then said taxpayer is made to look with a blatant intent to violate the law and all the other sheep will baaa and baaa in chorus at the so-called guilty because he dare think he could jump over the fence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 785269, member: 2189"] The State asserted Wesley owed a tax, rent if you will and it actually is in the true historical use of the term [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_rent"][COLOR=red]rent[/COLOR][/URL]. Wesley however alleged he owed no such rent and in some elements of tax law he may have had a point and legal standing. The State however has a monopoly of force and took Wesley to another monopoly they hold and that is one of so-called justice and a monopoly also on the rules of justice and what can and can't be used as evidence. And then we are to accept this verdict as not only just but morally true? We are denied in a so-called legal proceding to allow all evidence in which a person acted on and this same evidence could also point to a true good faith position that concluded with an incorrect total of tax liability but it was not arrived at by unlawful intent means. It's the very same thing people do when they make a mistake on a deduction, one taken in good faith and yet the IRS and/or DOJ can block any evidence trail that shows good faith and then said taxpayer is made to look with a blatant intent to violate the law and all the other sheep will baaa and baaa in chorus at the so-called guilty because he dare think he could jump over the fence. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Wesley
Top