Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
what exactly does a strike vote mean?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="satellitedriver" data-source="post: 1214177" data-attributes="member: 1664"><p><strong><span style="color: #006400">Typical corporate shill response. </span></strong><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/surprised.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":surprised:" title="Surprised :surprised:" data-shortname=":surprised:" /></p><p><span style="color: #006400"><strong>97' was not about UPS injustices.</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: #006400"><strong>The union members (only 15% voted) were stupid enough to give the negotiating committee full power to call STRIKE without the membership reading the UPS offer.</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: #006400"><strong>97' was, no less, and no more, a dog fight between Hoffa and Carey.</strong></span></p><p> <span style="color: #006400"><strong>The pension fund was the bone.</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: #006400"><strong>In 97' UPS could have bought out of Central States, to protect the pensions of UPSer's for $520 million.</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: #006400"><strong>It took Central States pension fund going into critical statis for the union to allow UPS to buy out the pension fund for $6 BILLION.</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: #006400"><strong>My response to the OP's question is that when one gives power to the few over the many that is a bad course of action.</strong></span></p><p> <span style="color: #006400"><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="color: #006400"><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="color: #006400"><strong></strong></span></p><p> <span style="color: #006400"><strong></strong></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="satellitedriver, post: 1214177, member: 1664"] [B][COLOR=#006400]Typical corporate shill response. [/COLOR][/B]:surprised: [COLOR=#006400][B]97' was not about UPS injustices. The union members (only 15% voted) were stupid enough to give the negotiating committee full power to call STRIKE without the membership reading the UPS offer. 97' was, no less, and no more, a dog fight between Hoffa and Carey. The pension fund was the bone. In 97' UPS could have bought out of Central States, to protect the pensions of UPSer's for $520 million. It took Central States pension fund going into critical statis for the union to allow UPS to buy out the pension fund for $6 BILLION. My response to the OP's question is that when one gives power to the few over the many that is a bad course of action. [/B][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
what exactly does a strike vote mean?
Top