Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4800127" data-attributes="member: 63706">I can&#039;t be bothered with clicking on the references. The entry is written with clearly misleading language, as is most of what passes for journalism these days. Most people can&#039;t tell the difference between information presented as factual and information presented as opinion. They don&#039;t understand what attribution is or why it&#039;s important, or what editorializing is, or why it used to be considered unacceptable by journalistic standards in a &quot;news piece&quot;. Now it&#039;s become so normal that it&#039;s almost impossible to find news articles anymore. They&#039;re all opinion pieces.I watched a little bit of the interview of the q shaman guy, and the interviewer started off telling him that he &quot;attacked&quot; the Capitol. That&#039;s not journalism, that&#039;s a forced conclusion in pursuit of pushing a particular narrative.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4800127, member: 63706"] I can't be bothered with clicking on the references. The entry is written with clearly misleading language, as is most of what passes for journalism these days. Most people can't tell the difference between information presented as factual and information presented as opinion. They don't understand what attribution is or why it's important, or what editorializing is, or why it used to be considered unacceptable by journalistic standards in a "news piece". Now it's become so normal that it's almost impossible to find news articles anymore. They're all opinion pieces. I watched a little bit of the interview of the q shaman guy, and the interviewer started off telling him that he "attacked" the Capitol. That's not journalism, that's a forced conclusion in pursuit of pushing a particular narrative. [/QUOTE]

Verification