Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
what would be most important about our next contract
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="UnconTROLLed" data-source="post: 814235" data-attributes="member: 18708"><p>That is a local supplement thing and not national contract. I thought we were collectively discussing the NTL contract.</p><p></p><p>I hear and understand what you are saying, we also have PT'ers working preload and THEN going on road eating hours/routes (supervisors as well).</p><p></p><p>The problem is that you cannot eliminate PT'ers from driving because of Art 40 and you never explained any reasonable solution around it. Article 40 is not changing . </p><p></p><p>The PT preload/ air drivers up here are the ones that come in and are asked to mop up the FT routes/shuttle work to keep routes as low as possible. It may be different where you are, but unless you are a steward and investigate the books you will never get a straight answer from either employee or employer.</p><p></p><p>One problem we have had lately are PT'ers coming in and stealing routes while FT covers (bid covers, 40 guar) are laid off, also stealing air work from FT 22.3s. These guys are making over 40 hours (in some cases 50-60).</p><p></p><p>Again, these issues CAN probably be resolved with some SUPPLEMENT language to each region that is affected. I agree with you there. However, "No more PT delivery/feeder work" nationally isn't reasonable IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="UnconTROLLed, post: 814235, member: 18708"] That is a local supplement thing and not national contract. I thought we were collectively discussing the NTL contract. I hear and understand what you are saying, we also have PT'ers working preload and THEN going on road eating hours/routes (supervisors as well). The problem is that you cannot eliminate PT'ers from driving because of Art 40 and you never explained any reasonable solution around it. Article 40 is not changing . The PT preload/ air drivers up here are the ones that come in and are asked to mop up the FT routes/shuttle work to keep routes as low as possible. It may be different where you are, but unless you are a steward and investigate the books you will never get a straight answer from either employee or employer. One problem we have had lately are PT'ers coming in and stealing routes while FT covers (bid covers, 40 guar) are laid off, also stealing air work from FT 22.3s. These guys are making over 40 hours (in some cases 50-60). Again, these issues CAN probably be resolved with some SUPPLEMENT language to each region that is affected. I agree with you there. However, "No more PT delivery/feeder work" nationally isn't reasonable IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
what would be most important about our next contract
Top