Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
what would be most important about our next contract
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="What&#039;dyabringmetoday???" data-source="post: 814300" data-attributes="member: 10135"><p>Again, Art. 40 has nothing to do with ground delivery and feeder work. My solution was clearly stated- full-timers perform this work. When there is not enough work, they perform pt work. The work load is not going to change, correct? I am simply saying that if you have part-timers working over 40 hrs., that is full-time, or rather, should be full-time. </p><p> </p><p>I also understand, to an extent, your point about art.40. The company tends to hide behind much of the language in that article. IF we ALL stood together against the continuing abuses we might have a chance at changing some of these issues. I am sure you are well aware, it won't get solved by any of us typing some words on the internet. </p><p> </p><p>I am really just looking out for the good of everyone. More full-time jobs, in my opinion, would be better than increasing the use of part-timers. Of course, this is an opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="What'dyabringmetoday???, post: 814300, member: 10135"] Again, Art. 40 has nothing to do with ground delivery and feeder work. My solution was clearly stated- full-timers perform this work. When there is not enough work, they perform pt work. The work load is not going to change, correct? I am simply saying that if you have part-timers working over 40 hrs., that is full-time, or rather, should be full-time. I also understand, to an extent, your point about art.40. The company tends to hide behind much of the language in that article. IF we ALL stood together against the continuing abuses we might have a chance at changing some of these issues. I am sure you are well aware, it won't get solved by any of us typing some words on the internet. I am really just looking out for the good of everyone. More full-time jobs, in my opinion, would be better than increasing the use of part-timers. Of course, this is an opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
what would be most important about our next contract
Top