Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Will ability to strike be inhibited by Supreme Court?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fenris" data-source="post: 5555615" data-attributes="member: 35081"><p>I disagree with your interpretation. There is no implication on loss of money or revenue or anything in the pipeline that may have gone to waste. Glacier claims intentional, malicious timing specifically to cause the concrete to go to waste instead of walking out at the start of the shift as the strike was already authorized and planned. That is different than economic impact due to lost revenue. and its all moot. The supreme court is not deciding the facts of the case, they are deciding if the law was followed when the case was dismissed. Different circuit courts have presented different interpretations of the law and it is their job to reconcile legal splits so that everyone is treated the same. If the court says the lawsuit can continue, it does not mean Glacier will win and it definately does not mean that unions are liable for lost revenue or anything that happens to product in the pipeline if they do not go out of their way to damage it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fenris, post: 5555615, member: 35081"] I disagree with your interpretation. There is no implication on loss of money or revenue or anything in the pipeline that may have gone to waste. Glacier claims intentional, malicious timing specifically to cause the concrete to go to waste instead of walking out at the start of the shift as the strike was already authorized and planned. That is different than economic impact due to lost revenue. and its all moot. The supreme court is not deciding the facts of the case, they are deciding if the law was followed when the case was dismissed. Different circuit courts have presented different interpretations of the law and it is their job to reconcile legal splits so that everyone is treated the same. If the court says the lawsuit can continue, it does not mean Glacier will win and it definately does not mean that unions are liable for lost revenue or anything that happens to product in the pipeline if they do not go out of their way to damage it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Will ability to strike be inhibited by Supreme Court?
Top