Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DriveInDriѵeOut" data-source="post: 5398724" data-attributes="member: 44954">The quotes of Fox News lawyers are literally them quoting case precedent from the MSNBC case.&nbsp; Which is what I just said.&nbsp; They cited case precedent and the whore&#039;s lawsuit was thrown out.Do you ever get tired of being wrong about everything?The Fox team&#039;s legal briefs compared Carlson&#039;s show to radio talk-show programs hosted by ex-MSNBC and Fox Business star Don Imus, who won a case more than two decades ago because an appellate court ruled that &quot;the complained of statements would not have been taken by reasonable listeners as factual pronouncements but simply as instances in which the defendant radio hosts had expressed their views over the air in the crude and hyperbolic manner that has, over the years, become their verbal stock in trade.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DriveInDriѵeOut, post: 5398724, member: 44954"] The quotes of Fox News lawyers are literally them quoting case precedent from the MSNBC case. Which is what I just said. They cited case precedent and the whore's lawsuit was thrown out. Do you ever get tired of being wrong about everything? [I]The Fox team's legal briefs compared Carlson's show to radio talk-show programs hosted by ex-[B]MSNBC[/B] and Fox Business star Don Imus, who [B]won a case more than two decades ago[/B] because an appellate court ruled that "the complained of [B]statements[/B] would not have been taken by [B]reasonable listeners[/B] as factual pronouncements but simply as instances in which the defendant radio hosts had expressed their views over the air in the crude and [B]hyperbolic[/B] manner that has, over the years, become their verbal stock in trade."[/I] [/QUOTE]

Verification