How Long Does It Take To Leave IBT?

D

deliver_man

Guest
With this precedent behind it, the Supreme Court probably would have struck down the Wagner Act as unconstitutional because it gives private associations sovereign power, which is clearly unconstitutional. Instead, against the backdrop of FDR's Supreme Court packing threats, the Wagner Act was upheld. This is known as "the switch in time, which saved nine." Politics trumpted the Constitution.

Well, that's certainly one interpretaion, but in politics the losing side generally screeches "unconstitutional". The supreme court is composed of human beings, not robots, and their personal politics plays a role in their descision making.I think it would be more accurate to say "executive politics trumped judicial politics". Here's a few links from articles that were written at the time:
http://newdeal.feri.org/nation/na3661.htm

http://newdeal.feri.org/court/newrep.htm

I'm slugging my way through some of that Mises stuff, though I'm no economist. interesting stuff, but I don't think I'm gonna come out with quite the same opinion as you did. I'll be sure to post my thoughts though.
 
M

my2cents

Guest
The Constitution is based on a set of sound principles. One does not compromise principle on the alter of political expediency, even though it is a routine proceedure today. A significant chunk of our country's welfare state was created during the Depression era. I don't believe statism was in the Founders vision and the National Labor Relations Act is one of the centerpieces of the welfare state. If you are interested in the debate on the Constitution itself, check out The Constitution Society. One of the most noteworthy articles in this debate was written by James Madison. In the The Federalist No. 10, Madison explicitly warns of the potential tyranny of majority rule. Many good reasons there for making individual rights and limited government supreme. Granting private groups sovereign power is contrary to this doctrine.

A couple of other books which have influenced my thinking are The Constitution of Liberty by friend.A. Hayek and The Law by Frederic Bastiat. The former is a Nobel Prize winner who wrote the famous book called The Road to Serfdom. This book was given significant credit for the fall of the Berlin Wall because copies of it were smuggled in for the intellectuals. The The Constitution of Liberty is an excellent primer for understanding the principles which our country was founded on. In the text, Hayek also challenges and debunks compulsory unionism. This should be easy to find at your local library or favorite bookstore. In The Law, Bastiat alerts readers to the politics of plunder and the effects from it. Bastiat was in the sane minority during the French Revolution. Many excellent lessons about freedom and liberty learned from the above books.
 
W

workinman

Guest
well, "my 2 cents" the one and only light in this dark age of political correctness....for a clear and ACCURATE interpretation of the constitution, go to aclj.org
happy.gif
 
P

proups

Guest
WOW......WHAT A THREAD!
zorro.gif


480 asked how long it would take to see the dues come off his check and we get replies ranging from personal attacks to discussions about First Amendment rights and the Constitution.

Can we move on?
barf.gif
 
O

ok2bclever

Guest
Sheesh! What a thread. I should be in bed instead of reading it, much less responding.
cheers.gif


This is going to be a bit scattershot as I just finished a thirteen hour day at UPS (and even though I was not over allowed, boy is my boss going to hear about it from his boss, they don't like it when anyone goes over 11 hours.)

While I don't agree that the passionate speaking (easy guy
applaud.gif
, (by the way, is there a legend for what all these smiley face icons are supposed to insinuate.
barf.gif
)deliver man is a fence post, I would be a bit embarrassed to continue an arguement with him after making that statement
blush.gif
as it seems to make a self inference of an emotional (perhaps phsycological) state. Trying for lightness here...

I don't support the union on many political issues, but using that as the reason for not paying union dues is just more rationalizing. Don't contribute to DRIVE if you don't support all their PIs. I don't.

Regardless of the current problems with the rehire issue of the Central States Pension Fund the pension is still a decent one that you <u>do not</u> get from our non-union competitors.

I find it amusing that some people view anyone that does not share their view does not understand the issue be it economic situation or 1st Amendment rights.

When a person states they have nothing against the union when every other statement made by them is anti-union, it comes across kinda disingenuous to me. Now delivery man would probably call it lying.
biggrin.gif


Plenty of companies exist with happy employees without a union.

UPS would not be one of them . . .


I don't have any problem with people leaving the IBT. It happens all the time (especially with part timers) and I always wish them well.

What I have a problem with is freeloaders that don't leave UPS at the same time, but keep the union negotiated wages and other benefits.

I have nothing but respect (don't agree, but respect) for someone who truly is not in the union on principals (this is extremely rare, most are just freeloaders using that as their excuse) From the little exposure I have had to the posts of my2cents I lean towards the probability that you are probably in that respectable minority.

I do not respect (perhaps sympathize, but not respect) someone who is not willing to pay his way. I suppose most part timers are independently wealthy and just pay their union dues because they are not sure how to invest it otherwise.

The union negotiated part timer's eighty five cent raise would easily pay the monthly union dues with money left over.

While I agree that the fact that the starting wage for part timers has remained frozen since 1982 sucks it doesn't have anything to do with this contractual raise.

All those down or near the bottom of the current UPS wage scale thought it was enough along with the other benefits when they hired in or they would not be here.

Now my math says where I work a 75 cent raise for a driver is a 3% raise and for the 6 year contract it would be a 21% raise.

For a part timer the 85 cent first year raise on a 8.50 dollar wage is a 10 percent increase and $6 over 6 would be a 70% increase.

Seems like the current part timer made out much better in improvements than did the full timer.

Staying with the company gets you the bigger and bigger wage through union negotiated raises.

I started part time with UPS in 1973 at 3.51 I believe. It took me twenty nine years to attain the lofty wage I now make.

Anyone who thinks 10% and 70% raise increases is being "low balled" is going to go through life really disappointed.
biggrin.gif


I like Retired's calculator better for the simplistic purpose it was put to. I see I could have 6428570465.068 if I invested that same 19 bucks at 50% interest.

So?

Can you guarantee 8%?

There was recently a joke going around about $1000 invested in Enron, Worldcom, Global Communications or beer a year ago. I can't remember the exact stats, but I know the beer return deposits led to a moral you would not want to pass on to the kids.
cheers.gif


my2cents,

Please be careful out on the route. I know you are extending your breaks to be able to get all that reading in.

deliver man,

look out it's a trap!

upslocal480,

Actually this post started with a statement, not a question . . .

I wish your finances improve quickly so we can have such an emotionally passionate pro union employee back as a contributing member.



PS - this thing got a spell checker for the tired?



(Message edited by ok2bclever on September 27, 2002)
 
F

feederdryver

Guest
I argued with my fence post just the other day. It won..now I got to put another coat of stain on it this weekend. Damn fence post !!!

GO BROWNS !!!
 
M

my2cents

Guest
ok2,

One thing I would like to point out about the use of political funds. You are correct about the use of DRIVE, although one is still paying the salaries of the officers who spend time administering this fund and time spent on other "in-kind" political activities, such as manning union-owned phone banks for get-out-the-vote drives. Additionally, the IBT pays a per-capita tax to the AFL-CIO. This is an organization I would never voluntarily support, especially after watching their political ads and I also think the AFL-CIO has a socialist bent.

In fact, there is one ad that is running in my local television market, which one station has refused to run because it is misleading. Personally, I find the AFL-CIO's political ads to be very offensive, including the above mentioned ad. Several years ago, one local ad portrayed one candidate as a rat. The only thing this did for me was to tick me off and set the tone for my future resignation one year later. This is an abridgement of my free speech rights because I would never voluntarily subsidize negative political ads. In the former case, I don't even like the candidate the ad is directed at, but still offensive to me nevertheless. Thomas Jefferson said it best:

quote: "To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical."

Even the guy from the NLRB agreed with me on this one. Personally, I'm very thankful for the Beck decision. Its far from perfect, but at least there is some recourse. My own conclusions in this area have come from reading a pretty wide variety of materials over the past several years. I think I'm standing on pretty solid ground.
 
O

ok2bclever

Guest
my2,

Like I said I can respect a diffence of opinion on principals, but the Teamsters are not all dishonest, nor are many of their goals, any more than management is all honest(and that is not a slander or libel, just a fact that both the past and near future will bear out).

Systems are not perfect any more than individuals are. That does not mean you should not work within the system to attempt to better the situation.

I feel the fact that a small part of the dues may go towards political advertising (and I also despise misleading negative ads and they pretty much seem to be all that is used anymore by all factions) is an insufficient reason to not support the union with dues.

I feel you have far more issues than that. Most with your leanings ultimately do what you keep bringing up.

"the sale of one's labor is a private and individual matter"

It's called management.

Realize, I am not saying that like name calling.

I have been asked and woooed my entire career. It is just not for me. Perhaps it is for you.
 
D

deliver_man

Guest
"the sale of one's labor is a private and individual matter"

It's called management.


Well yeah, I was kinda thinking the same thing. Don't worry my2cents, I took a long weekend to go visit some friends down in Florida (man it's nice and stress free down here), but I'm still reading through all those links....
 
M

my2cents

Guest
Offensive political ads and one corruption scandal too many was more than I could stand. I think spending my energy trying to reform the Teamsters is a complete waste of time. Even the reformers get retaliated on, just like Jackie Presser sending in a couple busloads of thugs to break up a TDU convention back in the 80's, for example.
 
O

ok2bclever

Guest
No, I wasn't referring to trying to clean up the Teamster high command or Atlanta, I will leave that to the younger, more high risk oriented members.
biggrin.gif


I was referring to using the system on a local level. While the contract language is a bit weak thanks to management's willingness to use unethical means with unethical persons, still a lot can be done using that language at the local level if your center/hub, etc is fairly united. I am not talking wildcat or anything, but human nature being what it is, local management will take the easiest way out and if your area is well organized that easiest way out can be favorable interpretations of contractual language to benefit all and a management attitude of no unnecessary harrassment or intimidation of the workforce.
 
T

therodog

Guest
starting to wonder if upslocal480 and saintteam0 are related.
 
D

deliver_man

Guest
starting to wonder if upslocal480 and saintteam0 are related.
In the interests of keeping the peace I will just tip-toe away from that one
biggrin.gif
 
U

upslocal480

Guest
What a bunch of comedians we have here. I suggest keeping your days jobs.
sleeping.gif
shoot.gif
wink3.gif
wink5.gif


(Message edited by upslocal480 on September 30, 2002)
 
Top