Stonefish
Well-Known Member
Why not? Is it that good that the company might want something back? Or is it that bad?
Ohio rider
- Thread starter Anonymous 10
- Start date
BigUnionGuy
Got the T-Shirt
PiedmontSteward
RTW-4-Less
Without being familiar with the specific practice, "past practice" cases are always a massive pain in the ass. If you're defending maintaining a practice, you have to get notarized statements from people detailing when/how long it has been that way, etc. Think of something that goes on in your center that's not explicitly set in the contract, but has "always been that way." Now think of UPS trying to change it over night and the uphill fight it would be to prove it has "always been that way" without it being written down..
The Jeep Driver
On the road less traveled...
When are we getting another vote?
Stonefish
Well-Known Member
The copy I have doesn't say anything about any other company other than UPS. It reads Teamsters Local 100 UPS Supplemental Agreement to the NMUPSA. I was just curious what you thought of it.
Stonefish
Well-Known Member
I appreciate your input, I have filed several pass practice grievances they can be a pain. I was just asking BUG what he thought about the 100 Rider/Supplement.
Again I do appreciate your posts you have a lot of good info.
Anonymous 10
Guest
I say let's open up the local 100 rider.
Stonefish
Well-Known Member
I say yes and we can get all those things we want in our local
Anonymous 10
Guest
It kinda makes sense. Quit holding me and my local hostage. My local is full of good members that want their raise and the new contract language.
Retiredmgr
Active Member
Can I ask you guys a question?
Do we need a steward?
BigUnionGuy
Got the T-Shirt
That probably can be a pain.... if you are filing on "pass" practice.
You mean Past Practice.... don't you ??
And no.... its not a Rider or Supplement. It's the Local 100 seniority practice.
What other local seniority practices does Local 100 have.... with National Contracts ?
-Bug-
Retiredmgr
Active Member
No, I am a retired manager. My husband is a package driver with 40 years in and would like to retire. If he retires next April , but he posted vacations for later in the year, is there a disadvantage for this?
Stonefish
Well-Known Member
I meant past practice slick willy and the book says Local 100 Supplement it doesn't say seniority practice.
Retiredmgr
Active Member
Ok, I will have him call the union hall
Anonymous 10
Guest
whatever it is I think those great local 100 members need to open that bicch up.
Stonefish
Well-Known Member
That's what she said
Anonymous 10
Guest
I'll leave that one alone.
Stonefish
Well-Known Member
Thats what she said
If he needed additional contribution weeks to gain a larger pension, there would be an impact of picking vacations in that manner in some plans. With 40 yrs in, that should not be an issue and he'll get paid all vacation due him, including any future credit he earns this year.
