Catatonic
Nine Lives
I understand ... just the ones you like.I'm not concerned with the origin of marriage. As it stands in our society it is a legal contract. Ttku
You should be a pundit ... but obviously, not a politician.
I understand ... just the ones you like.I'm not concerned with the origin of marriage. As it stands in our society it is a legal contract. Ttku
Franken to Gorsuch: “I Had a Career in Identifying Absurdity, and I Know It When I See It”
Clearly, that trucker's life was worth less to Gorsuch then the trailer and it's contents. He should have stayed and died of hypothermia or lost both his legs to frostbite and never have been able to work again, because the Corporate Entity has more rights than a human employee.
That is basic Conservatism.
I'm assume that since he is driving a truck he's not a billionaire ... So who cares?my question with that scenario.... how do the brakes interfere with the heating system of the tractor???
Culturalis Las Vegas a religious establishment???
I'm assume that since he is driving a truck he's not a billionaire ... So who cares?
Do you know how to read???The cabin heater was broken....so the brake's froze up, correct??
how does the heating system in the tractor stop working Stuart???
frozen brakes don't lead to "hypothermia or lost both his legs to frostbite"
That reminds me of a short story by Issac Asimov.My word for it is "fusion".
Do you know how to read???The cabin heater was broken....
Y
Never thought about it except in terms of "semantics".
Let religions/cultures have "marriage" and have the legal definition as a Legal Union (or some such term).
Same results and no sense of government intrusion into a social/religious/cultural institution.
A Libertarian still has to play politics...
Because marriage was already a cultural and religious institution before the USA was formed?Why people have to drag religion into the 'State' side of the marriage equation baffles me.
The lawyers are minions to the Judges who sit at the top of the Pyramid.The whole concept of gay marriages was decided by lawyers .
Judges are lawyers , along with lawmakers and public officials .
The problem with that idea is it undermines the old concept of marriage.Never thought about it except in terms of "semantics".
Let religions/cultures have "marriage" and have the legal definition as a Legal Union (or some such term).
Same results and no sense of government intrusion into a social/religious/cultural institution.
That's bull. You're happy for them, but you want them to have to use a different word so everyone understands that their union is inferior to yours.I really don't care about marriage honestly.
I'm just very happy for my friends & family who got married and have the legal rights same as opposite sex marriages had before.
Depends on how you look at it though doesn't it?That's bull. You're happy for them, but you want them to have to use a different word so everyone understands that their union is inferior to yours.
I really don't know you but your logic seems superficial.That's bull. You're happy for them, but you want them to have to use a different word so everyone understands that their union is inferior to yours.
is Las Vegas a religious establishment???
Cultural