[video=youtube;yOZI1jSJW2Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOZI1jSJW2Y&feature=player_embedded[/video] If any monopoly is bad in the hands of a single individual and a monopoly in the hands of a few individuals even worse, what is a monopoly in the hands of a larger group of people who think they have a proper role to do so because one group of people larger than the other said they had the power, right and God's consent to do so in some geographic space? How far might they go with that monopoly of violence if their own arrogance leads them to believe they have all the answers and some divine right from some spiritual higher power? What if the purpose of that monopoly is violence for the intended purpose to force people against their own will to do the will and desire set forth by others, so often a small group of others? And for those who would hooray the privatization aspect, to use a private entity to extract compliance to a public purpose as demanded by a empowered few is still no less statist as the first example! Violence and force whether done by a public or private entity is still no less morally and ethically wrong. The real truth is the only difference between the US Gov't and the Taliban is who you've been conditioned and propagandized to believe is the more rightous or brutalized to fear!