Strange. The Judge didn't have those videos up on the "Freedom Watch" website.
Seems
LewRockwell.com aren't seeing the video in the same manner as TOS is. In fact, I found the discussion good, informative and I think both men made good points. This is the kind of discussion this country does needs to have and outside the 2 party narrative too.
TOS,
Historically since man ended the hunter-gatherer phase and advanced into agrarianism and formation of nation-states, the institutions of man have always devolved towards exploitation of other men and a dis-respecter of man's natural rights and the right to voluntary action when such actions are minus force or fraud. Centralizing power and control into broader groups are nothing more than the same methods that street gangs use when they use force to consolidate power for their own benefit over an ever expanding geographic area.
The judge quoting others, "that which governs best governs least" also has application to scale. That which governs close to home also governs best and I'm a HUGE advocate of de-scale and decentralization of ALL systems of governance and control and yes that would also include the business world as well. You want to de-cry the so-called right for it's appearance of violence and force and yet you refuse to see the fact that the very system you advocate still requires "A gun in the face" to force so many to comply and not that the so-called right's idea is divorced from that scenario either.
It's ashame the Judge and Stewart don't read men like Benjamin Tucker who found a way to merge individual rights, true free markets and yet blend it with what Stewart called a "collective good" or as Tucker put it, Mutualism that is based on voluntary self organization. And if you think Napolitano is afraid of this type of contrasting discussion, you don't know the Judge as well as you think. On his last book when C-Span wanted to feature it on Book TV, the author picks the interviewer and the Judge picked an icon of the left in one Ralph Nader because as Judge Napolitano opened in saying, "You (Nader) have always been a hero of mine!"
You're are free to disagree with Napolitano and in your 2 party narrative world, you are locked into your own death spiral not unlike the so-called C-9 you rail against. Like Moreluck, you are gripped by fear albeit for different reasons but it's still fear none the less that not being able to "hold a gun to people's heads" presents a threat to you. You make a really good neo-con although neo-liberals are the same thing really. And you thought there was a real meaningful difference between you and the C-9!
But the fact is Judge Napolitano actually talks too and even in some quarters agrees with many true men and women of the left but then like Brett I doubt you know a real principle if it bit you in the ass.
Seems the C-9 just got an addition to C-10 from my perspective. The "echo chamber" just got a bit louder I see!
