Bush vs. Obama, Who Grew Physical Gov't Size More?

[wkmac]

Opps and you can't use the war excuse either.


I thought it would be the nice thing to do in providing a little music to accompany the reading for our so-called conservative friends still clutching the GOP/Small State brand. Of course, they'll show everyone at the next election, or the next, or the next, or the.............



Federal Bureaucracy Grew 70% More Under Bush than Obama

 

[Babagounj]

Wkmac , nice topic but try this question .....
Who added more regulations during their terms ?

 

[wkmac]

Wkmac , nice topic but try this question .....
Who added more regulations during their terms ?

Even more specific which goes to your point, who added more pages to the Federal Register and/or the Code of Federal Regulations? And not all regs. in the Federal Register are codified in CFR (fail to meet criteria of Title 5 Administrative Procedures Act) and yet are sometimes still enforced as if so. Federal Register may be a better judge on that point.

Truth is both Bush and Obama are utterly distasteful and often for the same reasons. And I see nothing as it relates to 2016' that suggests anything will change either regardless who wins.

“Economic and social misery increases in direct proportion to the size and power of the central government of a nation or state.”–Kirkpatrick Sale

“No person is so grand or wise or perfect as to be the master of another person. Teacher, perhaps. Setter of good example, perhaps. Genius, perhaps. But master, no.”--Karl Hess

"Powerful states can maintain themselves only by crime, little states are virtuous only by weakness." Mikhail Bakunin

 

[realbrown1]

Even more specific which goes to your point, who added more pages to the Federal Register and/or the Code of Federal Regulations? And not all regs. in the Federal Register are codified in CFR (fail to meet criteria of Title 5 Administrative Procedures Act) and yet are sometimes still enforced as if so. Federal Register may be a better judge on that point.

Truth is both Bush and Obama are utterly distasteful and often for the same reasons. And I see nothing as it relates to 2016' that suggests anything will change either regardless who wins.

“Economic and social misery increases in direct proportion to the size and power of the central government of a nation or state.”–Kirkpatrick Sale

“No person is so grand or wise or perfect as to be the master of another person. Teacher, perhaps. Setter of good example, perhaps. Genius, perhaps. But master, no.”--Karl Hess

"Powerful states can maintain themselves only by crime, little states are virtuous only by weakness." Mikhail Bakunin

You are so smart.

Oh wait, no you are not.

Quite the opposite really.

What a waste of a thread.

 

[wkmac]

You are so smart.

Oh wait, no you are not.

Quite the opposite really.

What a waste of a thread.

Music to my ears!

 

[BrownArmy]

You are so smart.

Oh wait, no you are not.

Quite the opposite really.

What a waste of a thread.

You are Trump!

 

[wkmac]

You are Trump!

Ah, come on, be nice. It's just a case of panic and fear.

Oh wait, that's what Trump plays on. Never mind!

 

[BrownArmy]

Ah, come on, be nice. It's just a case of panic and fear.

Oh wait, that's what Trump plays on. Never mind!

It's OK - he wants to be Trump.

There's a fallacious argument against liberals that they're 'jealous' of the rich, and RB1's arguments are the obverse of that coin.

Now, if he actually got what he wanted and had to reap the 'benefits', that's another story altogether.

"Deaf and blind and dumb and born to follow - what you need is someone strong to guide you".

 

[Babagounj]

Truth is both Bush and Obama are utterly distasteful and often for the same reasons. And I see nothing as it relates to 2016' that suggests anything will change either regardless who wins.

I totally agree .

 

[Babagounj]

Only needed 6 posts before someone jumped the shark .

 

[newfie]

Ah, come on, be nice. It's just a case of panic and fear.

Oh wait, that's what Trump plays on. Never mind!

try disgust with the liberal PC culture of today. expect a post from TOS next as he swoops in to kiss Obama's rear some more

 

[realbrown1]

Ah, come on, be nice. It's just a case of panic and fear.

Oh wait, that's what Trump plays on. Never mind!

I took it as a complement.

Because I have been called worse.

 

[realbrown1]

It's OK - he wants to be Trump.

There's a fallacious argument against liberals that they're 'jealous' of the rich, and RB1's arguments are the obverse of that coin.

Now, if he actually got what he wanted and had to reap the 'benefits', that's another story altogether.

"Deaf and blind and dumb and born to follow - what you need is someone strong to guide you".

I want to be me.

I support Trump.

Learn the difference.

 

[Catatonic]

You are Trump!

No, Trump is a smart and successful person.

 

[Babagounj]

Food for thought .
The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis updates quarterly a set of nine easy-to-understand charts that demonstrate how Obamanomics, the economic policies of the Obama administration, have failed to produce real economic benefits for the American people.









http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/obamas-economic-recovery-in-just-9-charts/

 

[Sportello]

Corsi, LOL!

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

Corsi, LOL!

But there's graphs.... you can't dispute graphs....
I mean there's numbers in those graphs, NUMBERS!
Buy Gold! The end is near.

 

[BrownArmy]

Food for thought .
The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis updates quarterly a set of nine easy-to-understand charts that demonstrate how Obamanomics, the economic policies of the Obama administration, have failed to produce real economic benefits for the American people...

http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/obamas-economic-recovery-in-just-9-charts/

I love it when there's a Dave Ramsey link in the middle of SUPER IMPORTANT GRAPHS.

 

[Babagounj]

I guess that everyone didn't see the fine print on the left bottom of the charts that listed the source for the graphs .
They were all gov't agencies .